Re: Hmm. A tough one for me as there are a few elements to it
Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 17/09/2010 04:56:53 PM
In theory, I support her side of it. There are a few big "but"s here though.
I tend to agree with you.
(I said "but"s, not butts!)

1) I think there is a real issue of a religion of convenience. I.e. rather than really following a religion out of belief in it, a group of people are using one as a way of claiming rights by pretending they're part of a religion.
I don't know how you draw that distinction or what criteria you place on it though. And arguably, there are plenty of people in major mainstream religions for whom it is a religion of convenience and not something they follow out of belief in it

2) The religious requirements - I don't think it should cover a preference anyway, which is what the nose ring sounds like. It should only cover something required by the religion like a Sikh's dagger etc.
So if this is not a religious requirement you would not be on her side of it? I was trying to tell from the picture in the article whether her mom was wearing one or not

3) Frankly, I'm kind of wary of a religion that involves under age people being pierced, tattoed or physically altered in a way that isn't for medical reasons. That sort of think should be for them to get when they are considered to be old enough to make adult choices. So I'd ban the thing anyway on those grounds

LOL, I think I would too. Along with those religions where parents keep minor children from receiving proper medical treatment.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Curious to hear your thoughts on this.
17/09/2010 04:00:52 PM
- 876 Views
Hmm. A tough one for me as there are a few elements to it
17/09/2010 04:36:49 PM
- 388 Views
Re: Hmm. A tough one for me as there are a few elements to it
17/09/2010 04:56:53 PM
- 455 Views
Re: Hmm. A tough one for me as there are a few elements to it
17/09/2010 05:11:16 PM
- 434 Views
How do they handle a Sikh's dagger?
17/09/2010 05:26:29 PM
- 359 Views
i doubt it's something that'll come up
17/09/2010 05:30:00 PM
- 345 Views

I believe they do that anyway. It's not as if they ever take it out, anyway. *NM*
17/09/2010 05:33:32 PM
- 145 Views
Not in the US, no.
19/09/2010 12:40:37 AM
- 359 Views

no idea. I referred to the US because that's where the article took place, though. *NM*
19/09/2010 04:12:22 AM
- 142 Views
Actually, Wikipedia says it has come up in the US and Canada both.
19/09/2010 03:28:40 PM
- 351 Views
this is not a religouis issue
17/09/2010 06:07:44 PM
- 397 Views
Short answer would be yes... but I'll wait for you to prove
18/09/2010 12:32:39 AM
- 396 Views
you can't "prove" evolution but I would guess you still think it is true
18/09/2010 04:36:45 PM
- 350 Views
I think she's a little nuts, but kicking her out of school seems silly. *NM*
17/09/2010 05:06:54 PM
- 167 Views
I'm not exactly sure what I feel about the religious connotations
17/09/2010 05:27:16 PM
- 327 Views
I live on the outskirts of Raleigh. First thought: "I bet this happened in Johnston County."
17/09/2010 06:48:41 PM
- 356 Views
17/09/2010 07:19:49 PM
- 420 Views

Headline: "Supreme executive, judicial, and legislative powers to be vested in Aemon, and Sareitha."
17/09/2010 07:31:49 PM
- 359 Views
You have to admit it has a nice ring to it.
17/09/2010 07:32:56 PM
- 360 Views
When I come to power, I'll be sure to remember you both for executive positions.
20/09/2010 01:51:08 PM
- 414 Views
I think dress codes, in general, are absurd in any case, so... *NM*
17/09/2010 10:48:11 PM
- 139 Views
Could anyone please explain the reasoning behind banning body piercings?
18/09/2010 12:00:00 AM
- 373 Views
schoolsprobably have lots of rules you don't like
18/09/2010 12:36:24 AM
- 373 Views

It wasn't the end to the world but it did instill a disrespect for arbitrary rules. Leg warmers were
18/09/2010 01:11:36 AM
- 394 Views
Utter crap, religion of convenience, has anyone looked at their twisted little doctrine?
18/09/2010 12:10:15 AM
- 358 Views
It seems obvious to me that they are fetishists hiding behind religion. Lame pussies. *NM*
18/09/2010 04:29:10 AM
- 146 Views