Active Users:1104 Time:03/05/2026 03:00:15 PM
You're in the Skype Chat now, btw. Joel Send a noteboard - 10/10/2010 10:59:24 PM
One's just a call chat left over from last weekend, which you may want to close if certain people get mouthy, and the other was originally set up to be Kylia Skydancers RPG chat, but it seems like most people are in both now (with a few notable exceptions who like to cause problems). Join any time you like; atm it's me, Stephen and Lucy talking NFL (which is to say, me talking and them being bored).
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 10/10/2010 at 11:00:02 PM
Reply to message
Chat - 10/10/2010 07:34:44 AM 1176 Views
Yes - 10/10/2010 11:10:18 AM 708 Views
Hey you - 10/10/2010 04:14:47 PM 789 Views
Hey Missa - 13/10/2010 04:35:46 AM 667 Views
I've already had several days like that. Yet people keep insisting RAFO is better without chat. *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:29:46 PM 419 Views
it depends which chat we get. - 10/10/2010 05:44:58 PM 764 Views
You're in the Skype Chat now, btw. - 10/10/2010 10:59:24 PM 681 Views
When chat used to be down for long stretches, everyone would just pile into AIM chat. - 10/10/2010 06:54:33 PM 823 Views
Which they could easily do with Skype and get voice, yet no one does. - 10/10/2010 10:56:55 PM 861 Views
The idea of voice chat creeps me out on so many levels *NM* - 11/10/2010 12:34:22 AM 795 Views
So don't do voice; we rarely do. - 11/10/2010 07:35:33 AM 789 Views
Same *NM* - 11/10/2010 09:40:29 AM 329 Views
Is that why the Edinburgh gathering pics are always nothing but sign language and dirty gestures? *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:36:00 PM 414 Views
Come and find out *NM* - 11/10/2010 10:48:56 PM 304 Views
The group that is popularized as being a part of that is not enticing to long standing wotmaniacs. *NM* - 11/10/2010 03:29:57 AM 453 Views
This. *NM* - 11/10/2010 04:43:52 AM 290 Views
Then that, again, seems a problem that coding can't solve. - 11/10/2010 07:33:32 AM 830 Views
I don't think most want to download another program when they had it so easy before. - 11/10/2010 10:39:55 PM 855 Views
Honestly, I think the "one time event" is the biggest problem. - 12/10/2010 04:20:04 AM 861 Views
I disagree. I don't think enough people think it worth the effort to deal with Skype. - 12/10/2010 04:28:21 AM 754 Views
What effort? - 12/10/2010 04:38:42 AM 740 Views
The effort beyond clicking two buttons. - 13/10/2010 04:25:57 AM 615 Views
Install, make a SN and search for people you email. - 13/10/2010 04:43:09 AM 792 Views
Re: - 12/10/2010 11:00:56 PM 619 Views
Then where are they? - 13/10/2010 04:00:46 AM 684 Views
You have a faulty memory. Chat was incredibly active as late as 2007. - 13/10/2010 04:24:25 AM 760 Views
Again, that's people, and not/having Chat won't change that. - 13/10/2010 04:45:40 AM 769 Views
Incorrect - 13/10/2010 04:58:30 AM 792 Views
Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 05:12:27 AM 847 Views
Re: Initially only the person who started it can boot. - 13/10/2010 02:45:50 PM 710 Views
And me! - 13/10/2010 03:27:15 PM 712 Views
oops, sorry about that. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:42:33 PM 665 Views
What do you mean where are they? There isn't a chat linked to the site. - 13/10/2010 10:44:10 PM 818 Views
So? - 14/10/2010 04:52:37 AM 799 Views
Are you deliberately trying to not understand? - 14/10/2010 05:54:16 AM 918 Views
Not deliberately. - 14/10/2010 06:21:09 AM 803 Views
I doubt that as well, frankly. *NM* - 13/10/2010 03:32:33 PM 338 Views
Things aren't what they used to be... - 13/10/2010 10:46:04 PM 733 Views
No - 13/10/2010 04:45:29 AM 700 Views
"Unmoderated" would be going too far. - 13/10/2010 04:53:19 AM 835 Views
Most of the group consists of long-standing Wotmaniacs, so. *NM* - 12/10/2010 05:25:39 AM 409 Views
I probably didn't phrase that right. Maybe an -er after long and an "in good" before standing. - 12/10/2010 11:02:30 PM 804 Views
Also, what qualifies as "good standing"? Who's the judge? *NM* - 13/10/2010 05:36:23 AM 440 Views
The one who wants to chat, of course? *NM* - 13/10/2010 07:23:15 AM 400 Views
Jonte is right. The judges are numerous. Each with their own motivations and interests. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:10:04 PM 378 Views
I'd fuck myself to death with a spike of frozen cat piss before I'd chat with that skype crowd. - 13/10/2010 11:42:16 PM 816 Views
Colorful. You big, gay elitist. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:06:14 AM 410 Views
See - 14/10/2010 05:42:21 AM 703 Views
we are Rafonauts now. - 13/10/2010 03:16:32 PM 662 Views
Yeah, I know, I came up with the term. Many still consider the "old gang" as "wotmaniacs" though. - 13/10/2010 11:01:58 PM 838 Views
I sure hope you're right. - 14/10/2010 05:04:26 AM 884 Views
I am RAFOlk. - 14/10/2010 06:22:25 AM 690 Views
When I got facebook I stopped logging in to aim. - 11/10/2010 01:24:26 AM 715 Views
There's a Chat if you want one. - 10/10/2010 11:01:57 PM 822 Views
i wouldn't say mutely - 10/10/2010 11:40:13 PM 795 Views
Ditto. - 10/10/2010 11:53:32 PM 728 Views
Well, like I said, talk about something else. - 11/10/2010 01:32:15 AM 752 Views
do you know how hard it is stopping sports fanatics talking about sports? - 11/10/2010 09:59:56 AM 835 Views
I'll usually shut up if someone carries another topic. - 12/10/2010 04:25:19 AM 767 Views
I'd deign to chat with you, m'friend. *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:43:13 PM 363 Views
- 14/10/2010 05:45:26 AM 733 Views
Re: - 14/10/2010 05:47:07 AM 755 Views
While I'm passing through, "Hi wooly and Kit. Long time." *NM* - 14/10/2010 10:14:49 PM 407 Views

Reply to Message