Active Users:875 Time:02/11/2025 06:06:50 PM
Good question John Send a noteboard - 14/10/2010 05:13:41 AM
And by the way, I think this one of the most interesting posts I've seen in a while.

Ultimately, some of the financial loss I've handed to the bank is being taken care of by taxes I've paid. So, between that and the fact that I did try to work with them I think any moral obligation to them is over. Even if that weren't the case, I still might have done it. Their policies are the reason my house was so expensive in the first place, and then lost so much value. They made all kinds of money during the housing boom, so it's only fair if they take some of the loss.

I would feel like I let my neighbors down, but my foreclosure didn't drop their property values at all. The banks here in Bakersfield are already holding so much inventory that the market will stay stable as long as they only sell it off bit by bit, which they have been. My foreclosure will only make the recovery in my city take a tiny bit longer. So really, not much of a moral obligation there either.

I think it was just hard to put it in the right perspective while the process was happenning. Thus the lost sleep.
Reply to message
Is walking away from a mortgage immoral? - 12/10/2010 04:45:43 PM 1524 Views
Just as a contract is a two way street - - 12/10/2010 05:12:09 PM 1011 Views
do we have a moral obligation to society? - 12/10/2010 06:00:17 PM 998 Views
It's a good question - 14/10/2010 02:41:21 AM 904 Views
Sort of have to disagree... - 13/10/2010 02:52:07 AM 973 Views
That's not true actually - 14/10/2010 02:35:43 AM 902 Views
Of course it's immoral. - 12/10/2010 05:13:16 PM 976 Views
But does one sided morality work? - 12/10/2010 05:38:56 PM 1095 Views
That's the only kind of morality there is! What the hell is wrong with you? - 12/10/2010 08:15:55 PM 920 Views
nothing wrong with me but I think you are off your meds again - 12/10/2010 09:34:33 PM 915 Views
Re: nothing wrong with me but I think you are off your meds again - 15/10/2010 02:50:49 PM 1420 Views
well I really can't argue with the wrong is wrong end of story belief system - 15/10/2010 05:40:22 PM 1112 Views
A contract isn't a promise; it's a legal agreement. *NM* - 12/10/2010 06:25:24 PM 458 Views
Which is why contracts have to be pages and pages long and combed over by bloodsucking lawyers. - 12/10/2010 06:39:18 PM 957 Views
I would agree with you if contracts didn't provide for breaking them. - 12/10/2010 07:33:15 PM 805 Views
Hrm. - 12/10/2010 07:35:38 PM 1028 Views
It's not immoral to break the marriage contract. - 12/10/2010 08:19:50 PM 1071 Views
I don't see that as the flaw in my logic. - 12/10/2010 08:37:52 PM 982 Views
Re: I don't see that as the flaw in my logic. - 12/10/2010 09:00:00 PM 1059 Views
also - 12/10/2010 09:37:38 PM 920 Views
That makes no sense whatsoever. - 13/10/2010 11:38:06 PM 1057 Views
That must be why they have you sign something called an agreementory note *NM* - 12/10/2010 07:33:32 PM 477 Views
Exactly *NM* - 12/10/2010 07:58:25 PM 443 Views
So, you think bankruptcy laws are immoral? - 13/10/2010 12:18:43 AM 951 Views
I don't think it's immoral at all. The contract usually specifies penalties for breach. - 12/10/2010 05:28:34 PM 1059 Views
I thought the answer might be something like that. *NM* - 12/10/2010 05:35:35 PM 428 Views
that is close to the way I see it - 12/10/2010 05:45:25 PM 904 Views
It's both legal and immoral. - 12/10/2010 06:37:49 PM 986 Views
You didn't mention the third party - 12/10/2010 08:26:56 PM 835 Views
in a way I did since I did mention society - 12/10/2010 08:54:07 PM 984 Views
Thus the edit - 12/10/2010 09:10:53 PM 1007 Views
either way I think you made a good point *NM* - 12/10/2010 09:38:58 PM 420 Views
will those neighbors... - 14/10/2010 04:52:26 AM 1146 Views
All depends where you get your morals from, really. - 12/10/2010 08:28:41 PM 977 Views
I guess what i was trying to ask, at least in part - 12/10/2010 09:48:24 PM 978 Views
What if you look at it from the other perspective? - 12/10/2010 09:00:20 PM 1005 Views
do you think they would if they had a legal way to do it? - 12/10/2010 10:04:57 PM 960 Views
Good point. *NM* - 12/10/2010 11:10:26 PM 444 Views
Sure, you could do that. - 13/10/2010 01:54:55 AM 997 Views
Much like the concept of morality itself. - 12/10/2010 11:47:23 PM 902 Views
I find this line particularly interesting. - 13/10/2010 12:13:18 AM 934 Views
Dunno. - 13/10/2010 12:56:56 AM 1029 Views
As a professional in financial services - no, it is not. - 13/10/2010 01:44:18 AM 940 Views
but almost nobody sees it that way - 13/10/2010 12:53:25 PM 943 Views
Is the deal that if you default, the bank gets the house and nothing else, though? - 13/10/2010 02:40:48 PM 927 Views
yes but the bank has a limited ability to collect - 13/10/2010 02:47:34 PM 843 Views
I think it's morally wrong to walk away from credit card debt. *NM* - 13/10/2010 09:43:11 PM 432 Views
I'm curious how you reconcile that - 13/10/2010 09:47:59 PM 958 Views
Collateral - 19/10/2010 07:21:14 PM 1455 Views
I agree, what do you think is different? - 13/10/2010 09:59:36 PM 954 Views
I lost sleep over it, but I did it anyway. - 13/10/2010 05:24:19 AM 1034 Views
OK what if you take it a step further - 13/10/2010 03:44:30 PM 1037 Views
Good question - 14/10/2010 05:13:41 AM 998 Views
I have some questions about this issue. - 13/10/2010 08:14:37 AM 960 Views
how do those questions affect the morality of the situation? - 13/10/2010 03:20:14 PM 904 Views
Obviously, the essential difference is can't pay versus won't pay. - 13/10/2010 02:16:07 PM 928 Views
are you socializing your debt when it is a private bank? - 13/10/2010 03:14:48 PM 983 Views
You are when said bank requires a bailout. And very many of them do. - 13/10/2010 03:22:59 PM 926 Views
it is the home fault that the banks have to be bailed out - 13/10/2010 03:49:37 PM 971 Views
I believe it immoral to do harm. - 13/10/2010 04:38:28 PM 994 Views
I really don't understand a system where this could be an advantage. - 13/10/2010 11:16:57 PM 936 Views
There's generally something like a 7 or 10 year limit on credit reporting here. - 13/10/2010 11:46:58 PM 956 Views
What's the use of suing someone who has no money? *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:48:47 PM 492 Views
You can garnish their wages. - 13/10/2010 11:49:36 PM 937 Views
With parsley? - 13/10/2010 11:51:37 PM 1009 Views
No, "someone" most certainly did not, wicked young Miss! Hmph! *NM* - 13/10/2010 11:52:40 PM 478 Views
If they suddenly come into some, you're entitled to it. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:07:34 AM 556 Views
Bit of a long shot. *NM* - 14/10/2010 12:09:12 AM 426 Views
Very. Best to cover your bases though. *NM* - 14/10/2010 10:04:25 PM 447 Views
Not if the doctrine of election applies. - 14/10/2010 10:14:07 PM 908 Views
Are we not talking about credit companies going after people who owe them money? - 14/10/2010 10:18:47 PM 960 Views
Yeah, I guess we are. - 14/10/2010 10:28:40 PM 988 Views
Re: - 14/10/2010 03:09:18 AM 962 Views
I am currently in that situation... - 14/10/2010 05:03:23 AM 1061 Views
Re: I am currently in that situation... - 14/10/2010 05:49:24 PM 1272 Views
it is easy for me and others to be glib when it is just a theory *NM* - 14/10/2010 08:19:16 PM 433 Views

Reply to Message