Cause they can go after as many of their customers as they want.
Or did I wander into a conversation where I misunderstood the context?
Or did I wander into a conversation where I misunderstood the context?
I was straying a bit into other areas of law, and rather forgetting the original issue. Also I've just learned about election so it was fresh in my mind
. It applies when you enter into a contract with someone's agent, but he doesn't tell you he's an agent so you think you're contracting with him instead of with his principal (the person he's an agent for). If things go wrong, you can pick which one to sue, but not both. Now that I think about it, this would never arise if the bank was suing the customer (although it could conceivably arise if the customer was suing the bank). Sorry for the digression.
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.
—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.
—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.
—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Is walking away from a mortgage immoral?
- 12/10/2010 04:45:43 PM
1563 Views
Just as a contract is a two way street -
- 12/10/2010 05:12:09 PM
1038 Views
Of course it's immoral.
- 12/10/2010 05:13:16 PM
1009 Views
But does one sided morality work?
- 12/10/2010 05:38:56 PM
1119 Views
You asked about the morality of walking away when the borrower still has the ability to pay.
- 12/10/2010 07:31:10 PM
920 Views
A company or organization cannot act morally or immorally? I strongly disagree. *NM*
- 12/10/2010 07:50:42 PM
452 Views
No, it cannot. However the individuals making the decisions for the company can. *NM*
- 12/10/2010 08:48:23 PM
396 Views
If banks can not behave in moral manner why should people be expected to behave in moral manner?
- 12/10/2010 08:07:56 PM
983 Views
I'm not absolved of my obligations based on the bad behaviors of others.
- 12/10/2010 08:25:33 PM
900 Views
Because it's their moral obligation. Morality is not a trade, you act morally because it is right
- 12/10/2010 08:47:41 PM
1098 Views
That's the only kind of morality there is! What the hell is wrong with you?
- 12/10/2010 08:15:55 PM
954 Views
nothing wrong with me but I think you are off your meds again
- 12/10/2010 09:34:33 PM
938 Views
Re: nothing wrong with me but I think you are off your meds again
- 15/10/2010 02:50:49 PM
1449 Views
well I really can't argue with the wrong is wrong end of story belief system
- 15/10/2010 05:40:22 PM
1139 Views
A contract isn't a promise; it's a legal agreement. *NM*
- 12/10/2010 06:25:24 PM
468 Views
Which is why contracts have to be pages and pages long and combed over by bloodsucking lawyers.
- 12/10/2010 06:39:18 PM
977 Views
I would agree with you if contracts didn't provide for breaking them.
- 12/10/2010 07:33:15 PM
833 Views
Hrm.
- 12/10/2010 07:35:38 PM
1048 Views
did you take a personal oath in front of god and your loved ones to pay the loan back? *NM*
- 12/10/2010 08:09:07 PM
466 Views
Let's assume we're talking about a marriage where no such oath was taken... *NM*
- 12/10/2010 08:10:54 PM
479 Views
if there is no oath of fidelity then straying would not be immoral *NM*
- 12/10/2010 08:40:53 PM
444 Views
It's not immoral to break the marriage contract.
- 12/10/2010 08:19:50 PM
1095 Views
That must be why they have you sign something called an agreementory note
*NM*
- 12/10/2010 07:33:32 PM
488 Views
*NM*
- 12/10/2010 07:33:32 PM
488 Views
I don't think it's immoral at all. The contract usually specifies penalties for breach.
- 12/10/2010 05:28:34 PM
1085 Views
You didn't mention the third party
- 12/10/2010 08:26:56 PM
858 Views
in a way I did since I did mention society
- 12/10/2010 08:54:07 PM
1010 Views
What if you look at it from the other perspective?
- 12/10/2010 09:00:20 PM
1033 Views
Sure, you could do that.
- 13/10/2010 01:54:55 AM
1029 Views
The problem is that you're buying something today and paying for it for the next 15/30/50 years.
- 13/10/2010 03:04:26 PM
917 Views
As a professional in financial services - no, it is not.
- 13/10/2010 01:44:18 AM
966 Views
but almost nobody sees it that way
- 13/10/2010 12:53:25 PM
966 Views
Is the deal that if you default, the bank gets the house and nothing else, though?
- 13/10/2010 02:40:48 PM
956 Views
I think it's morally wrong to walk away from credit card debt. *NM*
- 13/10/2010 09:43:11 PM
443 Views
I agree, what do you think is different?
- 13/10/2010 09:59:36 PM
978 Views
The difference is that the bank owns the house. Whereas when I buy stuff, it's mine. *NM*
- 19/10/2010 07:05:34 PM
442 Views
I too am unable to work out what distinguishes the two situations.
- 13/10/2010 11:54:15 PM
923 Views
I lost sleep over it, but I did it anyway.
- 13/10/2010 05:24:19 AM
1059 Views
Obviously, the essential difference is can't pay versus won't pay.
- 13/10/2010 02:16:07 PM
950 Views
are you socializing your debt when it is a private bank?
- 13/10/2010 03:14:48 PM
1004 Views
You are when said bank requires a bailout. And very many of them do.
- 13/10/2010 03:22:59 PM
952 Views
I really don't understand a system where this could be an advantage.
- 13/10/2010 11:16:57 PM
960 Views
There's generally something like a 7 or 10 year limit on credit reporting here.
- 13/10/2010 11:46:58 PM
984 Views
What's the use of suing someone who has no money? *NM*
- 13/10/2010 11:48:47 PM
503 Views
You can garnish their wages.
- 13/10/2010 11:49:36 PM
965 Views
With parsley?
- 13/10/2010 11:51:37 PM
1041 Views
No, "someone" most certainly did not, wicked young Miss! Hmph! *NM*
- 13/10/2010 11:52:40 PM
490 Views
If they suddenly come into some, you're entitled to it. *NM*
- 14/10/2010 12:07:34 AM
566 Views
Bit of a long shot. *NM*
- 14/10/2010 12:09:12 AM
439 Views
Very. Best to cover your bases though. *NM*
- 14/10/2010 10:04:25 PM
456 Views
Not if the doctrine of election applies.
- 14/10/2010 10:14:07 PM
943 Views
Are we not talking about credit companies going after people who owe them money?
- 14/10/2010 10:18:47 PM
984 Views
Yeah, I guess we are.
- 14/10/2010 10:28:40 PM
1015 Views
I am currently in that situation...
- 14/10/2010 05:03:23 AM
1088 Views
In Washington you can contest the assessed value used to determine property taxes.
- 14/10/2010 07:27:02 AM
1005 Views
it is easy for me and others to be glib when it is just a theory *NM*
- 14/10/2010 08:19:16 PM
444 Views
If you have the ability to pay, I would consider it yet another immoral act in an immoral industry.
- 14/10/2010 07:49:38 AM
1000 Views
