Active Users:2030 Time:26/10/2026 02:48:45 PM
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. Burr Send a noteboard - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM
I infer that there are substances that I will never observe but some other conscious being has or will. And I imagine that God observes all, but maybe even he enjoys the occasional emergent surprise. If any of that fits with what you mean by "spiritual substance," then yes.

But not in any animist sense. I don't believe that souls exist as a special substance, for instance. I am just one of many examples of awesome physical programming.
||||||||||*MySmiley*
Only so evil.
Reply to message
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe? - 14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM 1059 Views
no, it is mostly hydrogen *NM* - 14/09/2009 02:43:47 PM 358 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:01:32 PM 347 Views
not a chance *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:23:02 PM 346 Views
yes (in as much that we could choose to define it that way) - 14/09/2009 03:31:40 PM 907 Views
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM 806 Views
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons? - 14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM 848 Views
But merely positing a soul (as a spiritual substance) doesn't actually explain anything. - 14/09/2009 07:46:35 PM 750 Views
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM 824 Views
Re: i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 08:05:41 PM 816 Views
Carts and horses. - 18/09/2009 12:10:22 PM 958 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 05:14:33 PM 350 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM 822 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM 803 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things - 14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM 842 Views
That sounds very like gnosticism in many ways. - 18/09/2009 12:17:51 PM 883 Views
No. *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:06:59 PM 337 Views
define "spiritual'. - 14/09/2009 07:36:18 PM 796 Views
Rum. - 14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM 810 Views
YES! *NM* - 16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM 376 Views
How are we not married? *NM* - 19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 341 Views
Bigamy laws. *NM* - 19/09/2009 03:49:59 PM 375 Views
My Achilles heel! *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:30:06 PM 347 Views
Timing *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:51:37 PM 342 Views
My Achilles ankle! *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:14:42 PM 358 Views
Your Face. *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:21:44 PM 349 Views
My Achilles face! - 07/10/2009 09:40:36 PM 718 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:09:16 PM 326 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:31:14 PM 343 Views
Yes, vodka. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:02:19 PM 331 Views
Substance? - 14/09/2009 10:08:04 PM 796 Views
Yeah, boobs. - 15/09/2009 01:51:44 AM 778 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably. - 15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM 809 Views
Look, don't put words in my mouth. - 15/09/2009 04:50:13 PM 851 Views
Sorry. - 15/09/2009 05:14:10 PM 774 Views
Re: Sorry. - 17/09/2009 09:20:58 PM 757 Views
People over-complicate this, it's a sort of animal abuse - 15/09/2009 09:03:01 PM 815 Views
Nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 01:57:44 AM 363 Views
Very nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 06:57:57 PM 317 Views
A sublte nuance most modern materialists miss. - 18/09/2009 12:21:33 PM 1018 Views
I think there may be platonic forms defining purpose - 16/09/2009 06:27:36 AM 730 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause. - 18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM 941 Views
One little correction - 20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM 915 Views
Nay. - 20/09/2009 07:04:47 AM 752 Views
Re: Nay. - 07/10/2009 11:55:28 AM 866 Views

Reply to Message