Active Users:866 Time:29/01/2026 01:01:08 PM
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. Burr Send a noteboard - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM
I infer that there are substances that I will never observe but some other conscious being has or will. And I imagine that God observes all, but maybe even he enjoys the occasional emergent surprise. If any of that fits with what you mean by "spiritual substance," then yes.

But not in any animist sense. I don't believe that souls exist as a special substance, for instance. I am just one of many examples of awesome physical programming.
||||||||||*MySmiley*
Only so evil.
Reply to message
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe? - 14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM 960 Views
no, it is mostly hydrogen *NM* - 14/09/2009 02:43:47 PM 304 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:01:32 PM 288 Views
not a chance *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:23:02 PM 290 Views
yes (in as much that we could choose to define it that way) - 14/09/2009 03:31:40 PM 786 Views
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM 701 Views
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons? - 14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM 704 Views
But merely positing a soul (as a spiritual substance) doesn't actually explain anything. - 14/09/2009 07:46:35 PM 642 Views
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM 706 Views
Re: i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 08:05:41 PM 705 Views
Carts and horses. - 18/09/2009 12:10:22 PM 842 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 05:14:33 PM 290 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM 703 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM 694 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things - 14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM 732 Views
That sounds very like gnosticism in many ways. - 18/09/2009 12:17:51 PM 749 Views
No. *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:06:59 PM 281 Views
define "spiritual'. - 14/09/2009 07:36:18 PM 663 Views
Rum. - 14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM 707 Views
YES! *NM* - 16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM 312 Views
How are we not married? *NM* - 19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 289 Views
Bigamy laws. *NM* - 19/09/2009 03:49:59 PM 290 Views
My Achilles heel! *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:30:06 PM 296 Views
Timing *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:51:37 PM 289 Views
My Achilles ankle! *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:14:42 PM 304 Views
Your Face. *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:21:44 PM 293 Views
My Achilles face! - 07/10/2009 09:40:36 PM 612 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:09:16 PM 270 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:31:14 PM 291 Views
Yes, vodka. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:02:19 PM 276 Views
Substance? - 14/09/2009 10:08:04 PM 677 Views
Yeah, boobs. - 15/09/2009 01:51:44 AM 663 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably. - 15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM 692 Views
Look, don't put words in my mouth. - 15/09/2009 04:50:13 PM 739 Views
Sorry. - 15/09/2009 05:14:10 PM 652 Views
Re: Sorry. - 17/09/2009 09:20:58 PM 629 Views
People over-complicate this, it's a sort of animal abuse - 15/09/2009 09:03:01 PM 694 Views
Nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 01:57:44 AM 269 Views
Very nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 06:57:57 PM 265 Views
A sublte nuance most modern materialists miss. - 18/09/2009 12:21:33 PM 909 Views
I think there may be platonic forms defining purpose - 16/09/2009 06:27:36 AM 611 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause. - 18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM 809 Views
One little correction - 20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM 792 Views
Nay. - 20/09/2009 07:04:47 AM 636 Views
Re: Nay. - 07/10/2009 11:55:28 AM 747 Views

Reply to Message