How many posts have there been with swear words in titles?
Floffe Send a noteboard - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM
Remember, a search spider cannot tell whether a site has a language filter or not unless it sees swear words, and it's not like we get thee in every other post anyway. I think it's much more likely this site would be added to blacklists because someone would notice people spending a lot of time here.
Since you categorically state that we stand the risk of beng blacklisted, it'd be nice to see some data to back this claim up. Installing a few different parental control suites and trying to access the site should be enough.
Since you categorically state that we stand the risk of beng blacklisted, it'd be nice to see some data to back this claim up. Installing a few different parental control suites and trying to access the site should be enough.
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Can we swear at RAFO?
- 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM
1169 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear.
- 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM
831 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk???
- 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM
810 Views
I can't think of underage users
- 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM
866 Views
Well
- 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM
867 Views
That's a good point of course
- 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM
780 Views
Obviously we don't know what we don't know.</Rumsfeld>
- 22/11/2010 12:33:53 PM
890 Views
Apparently it's not high on Ben's priority list, so we seem to be fine for now. *NM*
- 22/11/2010 12:38:42 PM
401 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches.
- 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM
851 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles?
- 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM
726 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient?
- 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM
889 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb
- 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM
785 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy.
- 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM
906 Views
Subroutines such as what?
- 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM
1135 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now.
- 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM
1148 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless...
- 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM
796 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none.
- 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM
812 Views
well...
- 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM
822 Views
Re: well...
- 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM
799 Views
Re: well...
- 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM
778 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people.
- 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM
857 Views
new people is not the same as children.
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
387 Views
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
387 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college.
- 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM
822 Views
Please.
- 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM
830 Views
Of course they do; who do you think creates all those time sink--er, games?
- 23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
786 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
786 Views
I resent that.
- 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
695 Views
- 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
695 Views
Yeah, I may have skipped a few important people, too; sorry.
- 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
874 Views
- 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
874 Views
the whole community was younger then. It really doesn't apply to today.
- 24/11/2010 07:50:56 AM
761 Views
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals
- 24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM
863 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles
- 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM
789 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
- 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM
779 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk.
- 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
942 Views
- 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
942 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE.
- 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM
825 Views
I used the search function, it was just the number of post that had those in their title
- 22/11/2010 07:45:18 PM
755 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM*
- 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM
407 Views
Hey there!
- 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM
995 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though.
- 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM
857 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
379 Views
*NM*
- 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
379 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth
- 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM
772 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though.
- 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
788 Views
- 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
788 Views

Back off!
*NM*
*NM*