Active Users:426 Time:31/07/2026 12:36:48 AM
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals Joel Send a noteboard - 24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM
Also, you'd not be stop by big words like shit. :P

No, but I'm concerned about more than just my own well being and happiness (I know, weird.... :<img class=' />)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 1169 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 830 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 810 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 430 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 687 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 449 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 407 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 394 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 866 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 867 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 780 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 910 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 736 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 790 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 671 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 799 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 462 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 851 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 725 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 889 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 785 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 905 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 1134 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 1147 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 796 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 811 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 822 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 799 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 778 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 856 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 386 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 822 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 830 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 694 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 405 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 861 Views
Yeah, I may have skipped a few important people, too; sorry. - 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM 874 Views
the whole community was younger then. It really doesn't apply to today. - 24/11/2010 07:50:56 AM 761 Views
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals - 24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM 863 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 789 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 778 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 942 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 825 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 791 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 839 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 896 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 839 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 407 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 995 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 728 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 732 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 288 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 857 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 379 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 772 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 788 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 683 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 776 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 729 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 782 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 776 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 792 Views

Reply to Message