Active Users:4331 Time:14/09/2026 08:42:56 AM
Re: well... Joel Send a noteboard - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM
We're not debating swearing on RAFO; that's not going anywhere (at least, I hope not). We're debating whether we should have the ability to proudly say, "This site HAS no language filter", which seems a pretty small thing for which to sacrifice dozens or perhaps hundreds of potential members. Put another way: Which do you think RAFO needs more right now, new blood, or the ability to write "shit" instead of "shit"?

To be honest, if the alternative to writing shit is an influx of underage americans, keep the shit flowing. :P

*shrugs* I'm resigned to RAFOS slow but steady evacuation; no skin off my nose. As the underage Americans say, "It's your funeral.... "
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 1185 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 846 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 826 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 442 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 705 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 459 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 419 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 406 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 885 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 887 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 799 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 927 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 752 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 806 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 691 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 818 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 475 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 870 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 742 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 908 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 800 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 922 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 1154 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 1166 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 813 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 831 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 849 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 821 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 798 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 889 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 397 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 843 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 847 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 714 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 414 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 877 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 809 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 801 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 961 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 846 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 812 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 857 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 916 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 859 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 417 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 1012 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 746 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 749 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 299 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 878 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 393 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 792 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 805 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 702 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 794 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 747 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 799 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 794 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 808 Views

Reply to Message