Active Users:767 Time:28/12/2025 09:44:57 PM
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals Joel Send a noteboard - 24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM
Also, you'd not be stop by big words like shit. :P

No, but I'm concerned about more than just my own well being and happiness (I know, weird.... :<img class=' />)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Can we swear at RAFO? - 22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM 1093 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear. - 22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM 723 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk??? - 22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM 740 Views
Delicate? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:06:19 AM 396 Views
Yes? - 22/11/2010 05:37:36 AM 606 Views
I don't know, can you? *NM* - 22/11/2010 05:54:20 AM 417 Views
Why not try it an find out. *NM* - 22/11/2010 06:05:35 AM 374 Views
hell to the fuck yes! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:51:07 AM 359 Views
I can't think of underage users - 22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM 792 Views
Well - 22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM 798 Views
That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM 708 Views
Re: That's a good point of course - 22/11/2010 12:11:25 PM 840 Views
THANK YOU! *hugs* - 22/11/2010 12:28:38 PM 658 Views
Back off! - 22/11/2010 12:31:13 PM 712 Views
'SOK: I hugged a man (in public)... - 22/11/2010 12:35:16 PM 596 Views
I never had that issue. - 22/11/2010 05:38:59 PM 733 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 05:53:24 PM 424 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches. - 22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM 786 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles? - 22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM 632 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient? - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM 814 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb - 22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM 716 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy. - 22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM 830 Views
Subroutines such as what? - 22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM 1049 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now. - 22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM 1075 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless... - 23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM 698 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none. - 23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM 742 Views
well... - 23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM 750 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM 725 Views
Re: well... - 23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM 704 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people. - 23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM 781 Views
new people is not the same as children. *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM 353 Views
True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college. - 23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM 748 Views
Please. - 23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM 753 Views
I resent that. - 23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM 622 Views
Sadface. *NM* - 23/11/2010 10:12:31 PM 368 Views
... and later additions like Ghavrel? - 23/11/2010 10:24:28 PM 791 Views
Yeah, I may have skipped a few important people, too; sorry. - 23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM 803 Views
the whole community was younger then. It really doesn't apply to today. - 24/11/2010 07:50:56 AM 690 Views
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals - 24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM 786 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles - 22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM 721 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck - 22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM 711 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk. - 22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM 867 Views
Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE. - 22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM 750 Views
*NM* - 22/11/2010 09:36:20 PM 723 Views
Who said anything about regulation? - 23/11/2010 01:45:21 AM 763 Views
I love how you made Adam into a positive - 22/11/2010 05:40:33 PM 824 Views
For good or ill, Adam was very much a part of wotmania. - 22/11/2010 07:40:03 PM 766 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM* - 22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM 370 Views
Hey there! - 22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM 907 Views
A few honest answers. - 22/11/2010 10:54:30 PM 651 Views
Thanks - 22/11/2010 11:07:00 PM 655 Views
Perfectly alright. *NM* - 22/11/2010 11:12:43 PM 254 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though. - 23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM 788 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help *NM* - 23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM 343 Views
All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth - 23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM 683 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though. - 23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM 716 Views
*sniggers* - 24/11/2010 02:27:22 PM 597 Views
Has anyone actually voiced that concern? - 24/11/2010 02:28:23 PM 702 Views
yes. - 22/11/2010 12:05:23 PM 652 Views
True. - 22/11/2010 06:45:58 PM 721 Views
I love how the original poster hasn't responded to any of this. - 23/11/2010 03:11:58 AM 693 Views
Probably still in shock. - 23/11/2010 01:52:01 PM 724 Views

Reply to Message