Active Users:1494 Time:01/05/2026 09:33:06 PM
Oh yes, acceptance of homosexuality is new everywhere. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 25/11/2010 12:52:16 AM
But the US wouldn't have executed people for being gay in 1908, much less 1980. I'm just surprised that China cares enough to vote for this. It may be that they're just playing nice with their allies, as chandra said.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
UN votes to allow discrimination against sexual minorities (i.e. homosexuals) - 24/11/2010 02:11:44 AM 1253 Views
Pretty appalling, but also rather unsurprising on who voted which way. *NM* - 24/11/2010 02:32:37 AM 398 Views
Some surprises, though. - 24/11/2010 02:52:17 AM 1016 Views
I agree about South Africa - they have legal gay marriage! - 24/11/2010 11:04:10 AM 889 Views
Also, Bhutan? Wtf? And couldn't Russia abstain at least? *NM* - 24/11/2010 06:40:17 PM 411 Views
Hehehe, not surprised about India's vote - 24/11/2010 07:03:12 PM 908 Views
I was surprised to see China there. *NM* - 24/11/2010 03:06:12 AM 370 Views
Could have been a message of solidarity with its buddies - 24/11/2010 07:06:22 PM 884 Views
Why? Their exemplary record on Civil Rights? - 24/11/2010 08:08:57 PM 905 Views
When you return from vacationing in the land of False Dichotomy, let me know. - 24/11/2010 11:36:08 PM 774 Views
Re: Haha. - 24/11/2010 11:57:34 PM 1025 Views
Oh yes, acceptance of homosexuality is new everywhere. - 25/11/2010 12:52:16 AM 929 Views
Just so you don't think I'm ignoring this: - 25/11/2010 01:25:27 PM 1031 Views
Re: Oh yeah. - 25/11/2010 12:13:28 AM 793 Views
Very sad if not a shock. Democracy doesn't work people! - 24/11/2010 11:23:42 AM 902 Views
The Law and Justice isn't in power anymore on any level, remember? - 24/11/2010 02:29:41 PM 959 Views
No - 24/11/2010 02:37:30 PM 1002 Views
Very simplistic generalisation here, perhaps you should correct it *NM* - 24/11/2010 07:08:54 PM 483 Views
He said "tend to", not "are". *NM* - 24/11/2010 07:11:47 PM 503 Views
It is correct, thank you for your concern though *NM* - 24/11/2010 07:58:46 PM 382 Views
I disagree - 24/11/2010 08:10:11 PM 823 Views
Then you are wrong - 24/11/2010 08:19:51 PM 811 Views
Am I wrong, or are you? - 24/11/2010 08:28:26 PM 960 Views
You are - 24/11/2010 08:41:35 PM 776 Views
You did not read my post completely - 24/11/2010 08:47:07 PM 909 Views
I did - 24/11/2010 08:56:39 PM 867 Views
Really now, what kind of exchange is this? - 24/11/2010 09:35:55 PM 848 Views
A pointless one - it finished as it started. *NM* - 24/11/2010 10:00:37 PM 394 Views
How can such tiny stupid cow states have the same amount of votes we do? Disgusting. *NM* - 24/11/2010 02:50:10 PM 394 Views
Eh, whatever. Most of africa and asia voted to kill people. - 24/11/2010 06:09:33 PM 875 Views
Most of the nations might leave the UN in that case *NM* - 24/11/2010 07:13:38 PM 417 Views
Ah, the John Foster Dulles approach to democracy. - 24/11/2010 08:13:11 PM 911 Views
Pretty sad, and surprising that so many nations abstained when they could've swung the vote. - 24/11/2010 08:34:58 PM 938 Views
Do you ever get tired of your hyperbole? - 24/11/2010 09:48:21 PM 923 Views
The interesting part - 24/11/2010 10:05:27 PM 1182 Views

Reply to Message