Active Users:331 Time:12/07/2025 09:32:50 AM
As noted, the difference is we don't execute people for it, nor condone those who do. Joel Send a noteboard - 25/11/2010 01:01:47 PM
I mean to say that I think it's traditional, i.e., traditional family sort of thing. Which, I mean, is the same reason that conservatives (and non-conservatives) in the US give for not wanting to allow homosexual marriage. I mean, the issue has also been discussed in China, so it's not like they don't even consider the possibility of allowing homosexual marriage.

This "China's not so bad, and America is SO evil; it's really two sides of the same coin" thing would be funny if the stakes weren't so high.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
UN votes to allow discrimination against sexual minorities (i.e. homosexuals) - 24/11/2010 02:11:44 AM 1159 Views
Pretty appalling, but also rather unsurprising on who voted which way. *NM* - 24/11/2010 02:32:37 AM 361 Views
Some surprises, though. - 24/11/2010 02:52:17 AM 937 Views
I agree about South Africa - they have legal gay marriage! - 24/11/2010 11:04:10 AM 812 Views
Also, Bhutan? Wtf? And couldn't Russia abstain at least? *NM* - 24/11/2010 06:40:17 PM 382 Views
Hehehe, not surprised about India's vote - 24/11/2010 07:03:12 PM 835 Views
I was surprised to see China there. *NM* - 24/11/2010 03:06:12 AM 331 Views
Could have been a message of solidarity with its buddies - 24/11/2010 07:06:22 PM 810 Views
Why? Their exemplary record on Civil Rights? - 24/11/2010 08:08:57 PM 826 Views
When you return from vacationing in the land of False Dichotomy, let me know. - 24/11/2010 11:36:08 PM 705 Views
Re: Haha. - 24/11/2010 11:57:34 PM 938 Views
Oh yes, acceptance of homosexuality is new everywhere. - 25/11/2010 12:52:16 AM 857 Views
Just so you don't think I'm ignoring this: - 25/11/2010 01:25:27 PM 954 Views
Re: Oh yeah. - 25/11/2010 12:13:28 AM 720 Views
As noted, the difference is we don't execute people for it, nor condone those who do. - 25/11/2010 01:01:47 PM 950 Views
Very sad if not a shock. Democracy doesn't work people! - 24/11/2010 11:23:42 AM 829 Views
The Law and Justice isn't in power anymore on any level, remember? - 24/11/2010 02:29:41 PM 869 Views
No - 24/11/2010 02:37:30 PM 928 Views
Very simplistic generalisation here, perhaps you should correct it *NM* - 24/11/2010 07:08:54 PM 445 Views
He said "tend to", not "are". *NM* - 24/11/2010 07:11:47 PM 470 Views
It is correct, thank you for your concern though *NM* - 24/11/2010 07:58:46 PM 350 Views
I disagree - 24/11/2010 08:10:11 PM 748 Views
Then you are wrong - 24/11/2010 08:19:51 PM 728 Views
Am I wrong, or are you? - 24/11/2010 08:28:26 PM 856 Views
You are - 24/11/2010 08:41:35 PM 695 Views
You did not read my post completely - 24/11/2010 08:47:07 PM 822 Views
I did - 24/11/2010 08:56:39 PM 788 Views
Really now, what kind of exchange is this? - 24/11/2010 09:35:55 PM 777 Views
A pointless one - it finished as it started. *NM* - 24/11/2010 10:00:37 PM 359 Views
How can such tiny stupid cow states have the same amount of votes we do? Disgusting. *NM* - 24/11/2010 02:50:10 PM 359 Views
Eh, whatever. Most of africa and asia voted to kill people. - 24/11/2010 06:09:33 PM 788 Views
Most of the nations might leave the UN in that case *NM* - 24/11/2010 07:13:38 PM 384 Views
Ah, the John Foster Dulles approach to democracy. - 24/11/2010 08:13:11 PM 834 Views
Pretty sad, and surprising that so many nations abstained when they could've swung the vote. - 24/11/2010 08:34:58 PM 853 Views
Do you ever get tired of your hyperbole? - 24/11/2010 09:48:21 PM 846 Views
The interesting part - 24/11/2010 10:05:27 PM 1099 Views

Reply to Message