Active Users:529 Time:19/09/2025 01:31:15 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
*yawn* Macharius Send a noteboard - 13/12/2010 05:46:58 PM
Is that like federal judges striking down DADT? If so, get back to me when the Supreme Court's made their decision.
Reply to message
Federal judge in Va. strikes down health care law - trzaska2000 - 13/12/2010 05:21:37 PM 1068 Views
*yawn* Macharius - 13/12/2010 05:46:58 PM 735 Views
Another step closer to SCOTUS.....and that will be 5-4 decision in favor of repeal! *NM* trzaska2000 - 13/12/2010 05:55:54 PM 284 Views
It may very well end up that way. *NM* Tom - 13/12/2010 07:09:36 PM 321 Views
So riddle me this... Dannymac - 13/12/2010 07:23:14 PM 719 Views
He's not "making his own law", just denying the government the ability to..... trzaska2000 - 13/12/2010 08:06:48 PM 691 Views
That wasn't my question. Dannymac - 13/12/2010 09:10:39 PM 789 Views
I get what you're saying... Jeordam - 13/12/2010 11:30:13 PM 785 Views
Re: I get what you're saying... rempires - 14/12/2010 01:34:13 AM 811 Views
*heh* Jeordam - 14/12/2010 04:01:35 PM 727 Views
That's not all they're saying, though. Dannymac - 14/12/2010 01:42:27 AM 675 Views
At least in my mind.... Jeordam - 14/12/2010 04:10:38 PM 691 Views
Agreed; when do I get a refund for my share of the B2 bomber? Joel - 14/12/2010 04:40:25 AM 720 Views
But see...you are using the B2 bomber. Jeordam - 14/12/2010 03:59:27 PM 650 Views
Much as you are using the healthcare system. Joel - 14/12/2010 05:55:40 PM 770 Views
*nods* Jeordam - 14/12/2010 06:09:42 PM 748 Views
Again we're back to whether individuals deign to tolerate majority rule. Joel - 14/12/2010 07:27:22 PM 857 Views
Re: So riddle me this... everynametaken - 14/12/2010 02:51:35 AM 697 Views
It's judicial review Ava - 14/12/2010 02:47:43 PM 739 Views
Re: It's judicial review Macharius - 14/12/2010 03:27:28 PM 716 Views
Re: It's judicial review Ava - 15/12/2010 05:35:17 PM 814 Views
I really don't understand why people defend the forced purchase aspect Isaac - 13/12/2010 08:22:03 PM 762 Views
This analogy no doubt has its flaws too, but I was just reminded of it... Legolas - 13/12/2010 08:52:31 PM 773 Views
That's precisely the logic, yes. Joel - 14/12/2010 04:31:44 AM 733 Views
Forced insurance purchase would indeed be terribly unconstitutional. Joel - 14/12/2010 04:26:27 AM 686 Views
This judge... Dreaded Anomaly - 13/12/2010 11:26:09 PM 770 Views
there is a major problem with this.. rempires - 14/12/2010 01:29:41 AM 731 Views
Bad analogy..... trzaska2000 - 14/12/2010 02:57:28 AM 687 Views
Re: Bad analogy..... rempires - 14/12/2010 03:23:31 AM 701 Views
Not everyone uses the HC system and many can pay for it without insurance..... trzaska2000 - 14/12/2010 03:42:26 AM 685 Views
Re: Not everyone uses the HC system and many can pay for it without insurance..... rempires - 14/12/2010 04:53:39 AM 702 Views
Just to note.... Jeordam - 14/12/2010 06:11:57 PM 694 Views
Re: Just to note.... Macharius - 14/12/2010 06:44:54 PM 686 Views
Re: Just to note.... rempires - 14/12/2010 08:32:46 PM 689 Views
yeah, but the courts exist to strike down dumb legislation, which is what this ruling does moondog - 14/12/2010 03:17:04 AM 653 Views
No, the courts exist to interpret legislation, and the SCOTUS to strike down illegal legislation. Joel - 14/12/2010 04:36:59 AM 667 Views
I'll excerpt some relevant passages, but the full article is in the link. Macharius - 14/12/2010 02:10:48 PM 841 Views
In other words there may be a painful silver lining. Joel - 14/12/2010 07:46:38 PM 613 Views
He partially owns the lobby aiming to make it unconstitutional, which the plaintiff was a client of *NM* Jragghen - 14/12/2010 05:35:21 PM 351 Views
Update: the judge's decision is basically nonsense. Dreaded Anomaly - 14/12/2010 08:04:27 PM 946 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes