Re: Not everyone uses the HC system and many can pay for it without insurance.....
rempires Send a noteboard - 14/12/2010 04:53:39 AM
.....it is their right to choose.
and not everyone use's car insurance, I have never been in an accident (granted I have only been driving for 7 years, so maybe on day i will), that's why if you can't afford it you just don't drive, even if you won't use it. Health care does not work that way a hospital MUST serve you, whether you can afford it or not therefore increasing other peoples rates. In order for you to claim that not everyone uses it you must give the hospitals the ability to turn someone away without insurance, oh someone broke into your house, shot you and now you bleeding to death, sorry we can't service you. As for the "many can pay for it without insurance" i broke my noise (i do have insurance, and good thing to my ER bill was $68,000 before insurance for a cat-scan, a few pain pills, and 3 hours in the hospital). Some people could afford that, I'm pretty sure bill gates could afford any car accident he's in, he's still required to have car insurance though.
and before anyone says anything about me going to the hospital for every little thing, that's the only bone I've ever broken in my body, and the only time I've ever been in a hospital as a patient, besides my birth of course. Plus it was broken in 4 spots...
Federal judge in Va. strikes down health care law -
13/12/2010 05:21:37 PM
- 1054 Views

*yawn*
13/12/2010 05:46:58 PM
- 714 Views
Another step closer to SCOTUS.....and that will be 5-4 decision in favor of repeal!
*NM*
13/12/2010 05:55:54 PM
- 277 Views

So riddle me this...
13/12/2010 07:23:14 PM
- 702 Views
He's not "making his own law", just denying the government the ability to.....
13/12/2010 08:06:48 PM
- 669 Views
That wasn't my question.
13/12/2010 09:10:39 PM
- 768 Views
I get what you're saying...
13/12/2010 11:30:13 PM
- 767 Views
Agreed; when do I get a refund for my share of the B2 bomber?
14/12/2010 04:40:25 AM
- 699 Views
But see...you are using the B2 bomber.
14/12/2010 03:59:27 PM
- 630 Views
Much as you are using the healthcare system.
14/12/2010 05:55:40 PM
- 748 Views
*nods*
14/12/2010 06:09:42 PM
- 725 Views
Again we're back to whether individuals deign to tolerate majority rule.
14/12/2010 07:27:22 PM
- 841 Views
It's judicial review
14/12/2010 02:47:43 PM
- 722 Views
I really don't understand why people defend the forced purchase aspect
13/12/2010 08:22:03 PM
- 743 Views
This analogy no doubt has its flaws too, but I was just reminded of it...
13/12/2010 08:52:31 PM
- 754 Views
Forced insurance purchase would indeed be terribly unconstitutional.
14/12/2010 04:26:27 AM
- 668 Views
there is a major problem with this..
14/12/2010 01:29:41 AM
- 710 Views
Bad analogy.....
14/12/2010 02:57:28 AM
- 669 Views
Re: Bad analogy.....
14/12/2010 03:23:31 AM
- 681 Views
Not everyone uses the HC system and many can pay for it without insurance.....
14/12/2010 03:42:26 AM
- 667 Views
Re: Not everyone uses the HC system and many can pay for it without insurance.....
14/12/2010 04:53:39 AM
- 681 Views
Just to note....
14/12/2010 06:11:57 PM
- 677 Views
yeah, but the courts exist to strike down dumb legislation, which is what this ruling does
14/12/2010 03:17:04 AM
- 630 Views
No, the courts exist to interpret legislation, and the SCOTUS to strike down illegal legislation.
14/12/2010 04:36:59 AM
- 646 Views
I'll excerpt some relevant passages, but the full article is in the link.
14/12/2010 02:10:48 PM
- 818 Views
He partially owns the lobby aiming to make it unconstitutional, which the plaintiff was a client of *NM*
14/12/2010 05:35:21 PM
- 342 Views