Incest is close family members having sex with each other.
Which can include siblings, first cousins, etc - against the kneejerk reaction to assume parent/child.
Some legal questions.
12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM
- 574 Views
Yes to both
12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM
- 329 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children.
12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM
- 287 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children.
12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM
- 291 Views
No and depends
12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM
- 321 Views
Re: No and depends
12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM
- 274 Views
Re: No and depends
13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM
- 267 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent.
12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM
- 262 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM*
12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM
- 115 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family.
12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM
- 281 Views
You're confusing two separate issues.
12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM
- 283 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well.
12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM
- 250 Views
How? Why?
12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM
- 282 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized.
13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM
- 229 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life.
12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM
- 308 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers.
12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM
- 303 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers.
12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM
- 264 Views
no to both
12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM
- 282 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is.
12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM
- 269 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong
13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM
- 256 Views