Active Users:184 Time:19/05/2024 05:34:47 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: No and depends snoopcester Send a noteboard - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM
You originally said: "both in terms of grooming until that relative is old enough" - which certainly implies an age difference significant enough for the junior person to be under the authority of the senior complete enough that the junior would be willing to trust the senior blindly. AKA parent/child, though I imagine the case of a significantly older sibling would approximate the same if there were no actual parents around.


I did say that but I didn't and don't see it as implying an age gap of any significant sort.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Some legal questions. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM 574 Views
Yes to both Maria - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM 328 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM 287 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children. Macharius - 12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM 290 Views
Incest with children is outside the scope of the question posed. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:38:39 PM 280 Views
Who brought children into it? Tim - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM 273 Views
No and depends snoopcester - 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM 320 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM 274 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM 267 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM 271 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM 234 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM 262 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM 114 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. Joel - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM 281 Views
You're confusing two separate issues. Tom - 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM 283 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well. Joel - 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM 249 Views
How? Why? Tom - 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM 282 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. Joel - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM 229 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM 308 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM 303 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM 264 Views
Of course a corpse is property. Tom - 13/01/2011 05:27:34 AM 281 Views
Apparently it isn't, at least in California. Tim - 13/01/2011 09:35:29 AM 335 Views
Strangely Camilla - 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM 215 Views
consensual necrophilia? moondog - 12/01/2011 09:40:44 PM 271 Views
Re: consensual necrophilia? Rebekah - 12/01/2011 09:43:40 PM 250 Views
no to both random thoughts - 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM 282 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM 269 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong random thoughts - 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM 256 Views
Hm? nossy - 12/01/2011 11:07:19 PM 276 Views
Well said (on both) *NM* ironclad - 12/01/2011 11:22:08 PM 124 Views
Interesting... globug0822 - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM 272 Views
yes to both *NM* Aisha - 13/01/2011 06:21:39 AM 105 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Novo - 13/01/2011 08:33:18 AM 272 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Darth_Katie - 13/01/2011 07:06:04 PM 285 Views
hhmmmm mick - 14/01/2011 03:55:38 AM 259 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes