Active Users:1034 Time:11/09/2026 02:20:10 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Interesting... globug0822 Send a noteboard - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM
Tim was going to ask this the other day (he's just had an exam for criminal law) but forgot so I have decided to do it for him.

1) Do you think (consensual) incest should be illegal? Please give your reason.


Depends. How closely related? How old are they? For the most art I would say no. Whatever people want to do is their business as long as it doesn't hurt others.

2) What about necrophilia?


Ew. No. There should be some kind of respect of the dead. I guess if someone *donated* their body for sexual purposes but still... that's just gross.
~g~

*MySmiley*
CrazedWeasel
"Do not waste time bothering whether you "love" your neighbor; act as if you did...When you are behaving as if you loved someone you will presently come to love him."-- C. S. Lewis
Reply to message
Some legal questions. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM 780 Views
Yes to both Maria - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM 534 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM 523 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children. Macharius - 12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM 493 Views
Incest with children is outside the scope of the question posed. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:38:39 PM 477 Views
Who brought children into it? Tim - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM 490 Views
No and depends snoopcester - 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM 527 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM 474 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM 480 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM 472 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM 445 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM 456 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM 205 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. Joel - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM 482 Views
You're confusing two separate issues. Tom - 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM 484 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well. Joel - 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM 454 Views
How? Why? Tom - 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM 489 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. Joel - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM 439 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM 525 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM 512 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM 461 Views
Of course a corpse is property. Tom - 13/01/2011 05:27:34 AM 494 Views
Apparently it isn't, at least in California. Tim - 13/01/2011 09:35:29 AM 560 Views
Strangely Camilla - 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM 426 Views
consensual necrophilia? moondog - 12/01/2011 09:40:44 PM 484 Views
Re: consensual necrophilia? Rebekah - 12/01/2011 09:43:40 PM 451 Views
no to both random thoughts - 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM 478 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM 473 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong random thoughts - 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM 471 Views
Hm? nossy - 12/01/2011 11:07:19 PM 476 Views
Well said (on both) *NM* ironclad - 12/01/2011 11:22:08 PM 209 Views
Interesting... globug0822 - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM 459 Views
yes to both *NM* Aisha - 13/01/2011 06:21:39 AM 190 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Novo - 13/01/2011 08:33:18 AM 473 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Darth_Katie - 13/01/2011 07:06:04 PM 485 Views
hhmmmm mick - 14/01/2011 03:55:38 AM 451 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes