So I will merely say that a large part of the Christian faith focuses on exactly that - resisting the temptations of the flesh.
Celibacy is celibacy, among heterosexual or homosexual people. But when most denominations of Christianity allow heterosexual people to give in to the "temptations of the flesh" as long as they do it within marriage, while denying homosexual people that possibility, yes, well, then it's kind of hypocritical for them to talk about "resisting the temptations of the flesh" when they do no such thing themselves.
Christian values only prohibit heterosexual sex OUTSIDE of marriage. Not within marriage. Where's the hypocrisy if you do exactly as your faith tells you to?
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old
- 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM
1358 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM*
- 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM
508 Views
It was something that made me laugh?
- 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM
869 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM
512 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard"
- 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM
806 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care
- 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM
853 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM
411 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle...
- 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM
937 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human
- 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM
844 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here...
- 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM
892 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex.
- 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM
820 Views
Err...no.
- 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM
1071 Views
Re: Err...no.
- 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM
1006 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed...
- 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM
885 Views
Nah, I know better than to argue with you. I just thought your phrasing was rather silly.
- 27/01/2011 10:14:50 PM
761 Views
I completely and utterly disagree
- 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM
814 Views
The carnal nature of the flesh just happens to be the way we're all innately broken.
- 27/01/2011 11:30:09 PM
971 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away.
- 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM
780 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM*
- 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM
463 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But...
- 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM
964 Views
I was thinking along the lines of Christans who are gay or or believe in gay rights.
- 27/01/2011 09:29:50 PM
844 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim.
- 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM
822 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? 
- 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM
963 Views
- 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM
963 Views
Don't even know what that means. 
- 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM
742 Views
- 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM
742 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism
- 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM
935 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know.
- 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM
812 Views
- 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM
812 Views
Point of emphasis.
- 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM
914 Views
- 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM
914 Views
Agreed. *NM*
- 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM
440 Views
*NM*
- 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM
440 Views
Then I'm confused, either about what you believe or how you reconcile it with my second paragraph.
- 28/01/2011 10:54:13 PM
1002 Views
At the risk of simplifying: All roads don't lead to Cleveland, nor do they lead to God.
- 01/02/2011 03:47:57 PM
1077 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies
- 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM
741 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much"
- 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM
782 Views
This guy needs serious mental help, in my humble laymans opinion.
- 27/01/2011 11:42:00 PM
833 Views