Active Users:376 Time:17/06/2025 12:16:18 AM
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... Shannow Send a noteboard - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM
Christian values only prohibit heterosexual sex OUTSIDE of marriage. Not within marriage. Where's the hypocrisy if you do exactly as your faith tells you to?

The hypocrisy is in making it possible for some people to use that way around the prohibition, and not for others. If "the temptations of the flesh" are perfectly fine when they happen within marriage, then they should be just as fine when they happen between those who would be married if they weren't arbitrarily denied the right to do so.


There is no argument. The rules are indeed arbitrary. That's the whole point.

One act is saved specifically for marriage. The other is prohibited altogether. Either accept it or don't follow that particular faith. Simple as that.
Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1344 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 536 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 502 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 855 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 505 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 790 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 839 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 821 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 1025 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 462 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1141 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 404 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 926 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 795 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 874 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 802 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 1056 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 994 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 872 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 435 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 893 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 1057 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 799 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 766 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1187 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 930 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 458 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 952 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 733 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 459 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 772 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 929 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 807 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 953 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 725 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 921 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 798 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 904 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 432 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 728 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 466 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 762 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 465 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 845 Views

Reply to Message