Active Users:352 Time:30/04/2025 10:31:25 PM
Nah, I know better than to argue with you. I just thought your phrasing was rather silly. Legolas Send a noteboard - 27/01/2011 10:14:50 PM
If you're going to tell gay people to suck it up because Christianity can't and won't tolerate them, you could at least say so straightforwardly instead of talking about "temptations of the flesh". Though I suppose you just did that, so that's a nice end to the conversation, then.
Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1329 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 531 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 497 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 846 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 497 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 778 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 830 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 815 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 1013 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 459 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1127 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 401 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 915 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 776 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 861 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 794 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 1040 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 982 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 857 Views
Nah, I know better than to argue with you. I just thought your phrasing was rather silly. - 27/01/2011 10:14:50 PM 737 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 432 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 877 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 1050 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 787 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 757 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1176 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 919 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 456 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 944 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 722 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 454 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 762 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 920 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 796 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 941 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 715 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 910 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 790 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 891 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 428 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 717 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 460 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 749 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 460 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 830 Views

Reply to Message