Active Users:630 Time:19/03/2026 05:35:23 AM
All the talk about cut blocking being the same as chop blocking. Joel Send a noteboard - 08/02/2011 03:02:38 PM
Which really demonstrates nothing more than either a poor grasp of the rule book or denial of reality, take your pick. I heard it less from Packers fans than from traditonal Broncos rivals, but I heard it from them, too. It's not that Denver had one of the all time great offensive lines (that furnished the teams first HoFer to date) any more than ANOTHER of the all time great offensive lines earned Dallas the '95 NFC Championship (what a great time to be a Cowboys fan in Milwaukee.... :)) When you lose your opponents must've cheated, and when you win it's time to predict 16-0 before next season even starts. That's a combination that produces annoying losers and insufferable winners.
I am either friends of or related to some pretty hardcore GB fans, I remember that game, and I remember the perfect storm of a highly talented Denver squad FINALLY actually doing something with Elway's talent. We couldn't execute with the folks we had on the field, and Denver did.

The main things I remember are the Helicopter tackle, the always breathtaking Terrell Davis running (his stats actually got BETTER the deeper Denver went into the playoffs, and his career playoff numbers are still unmatched) and the Eddie Mac pancake block on a linebacker fifty pounds heavier that set up 1st and G on the game winning TD. That, and Davis leaving the game in the first quarter because of a migraine that left him blind, only to return, still blind, to fake a run to the left at the goal line that drew the entire Packers D after him while Elway scampered right and into the end zone.
The job of the offense is to move the ball and score. If you do that, no one cares how you did it. If you lose, the fact that you ran a certain offense won't cushion the blow. I would have been just as happy to have won yesterday with Packer Sweep after Packer Sweep. As is, I'm liking the WCO. I'm liking our dominating defense. Given we're the Super Bowl champs, there isn't a whole lot about our team to dislike save the fact that they aren't your team.

Your running game is pretty dismal, man. I wouldn't get to used to it either; one of these days the Competition Committee is going to start asking itself some hard questions. Like

Do we really believe that the best QBs of the past 90 years all happen to be playing RIGHT NOW?

Is it reasonable that in a SB between two premiere defences the LOSER scored 25 points?

Does it really make sense that the SB Champs, despite being a wildcard team, only had 100 rushing yards in ONE post season game?

Have we maybe made things a BIT too easy for offenses, especially passers and receivers?

It sells tickets and ads, but the players, coaches and refs who make the rules aren't going to be satisfied with it for long, IMHO. I'm an offensively and passing minded guy, but this business of wrapping QBs in foam so that you can't hit 'em low, can't hit 'em high, can't hit 'em hard and can't allow your helmet to touch anyone, while receivers are practically illegal to even look at it until well after they've made a catch, is a temporary aberration. At least, I hope it is, or it'll become impossible to deny the charges that the NFL is "armor plated sissyball".
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Super Bowl XLV Pick 'Em: Pittsburgh Steelers vs. Green Bay Packers - 06/02/2011 10:54:32 PM 893 Views
I'll go with the Steeelers... - 06/02/2011 11:04:10 PM 587 Views
At least they're not the Packers. - 06/02/2011 11:32:18 PM 692 Views
Ill go with the Packers (not as many accused rapists on that team) *NM* - 06/02/2011 11:31:43 PM 334 Views
Guilty once accused? - 06/02/2011 11:59:01 PM 711 Views
Packers! - 06/02/2011 11:57:53 PM 640 Views
Bleah, but OK. - 07/02/2011 12:02:01 AM 725 Views
And the Packer pick off! - 07/02/2011 12:08:27 AM 642 Views
Re: Bleah, but OK. - 07/02/2011 10:29:35 PM 668 Views
He did get pushed into Roethlisberger at a very inopportune time. - 08/02/2011 01:31:27 PM 906 Views
Re: He did get pushed into Roethlisberger at a very inopportune time. - 09/02/2011 12:16:22 AM 762 Views
Obviously I pick the Pack... - 07/02/2011 01:04:18 AM 690 Views
The good news is Roethlisberger's a mediocre QB. - 07/02/2011 02:23:45 AM 686 Views
"Oh, we can't throw deep on 2nd and short because we might loose the ball". - 07/02/2011 02:32:43 AM 755 Views
Better keep replying. - 07/02/2011 02:38:15 AM 579 Views
Seriously? - 07/02/2011 03:20:44 AM 738 Views
Thanks! - 07/02/2011 03:31:29 AM 651 Views
NP - 07/02/2011 04:11:40 AM 711 Views
Pack won by 6. - 07/02/2011 04:21:06 AM 638 Views
Right, I keep forgetting the last FG, sorry. - 07/02/2011 06:19:50 AM 681 Views
The offense scored 24 points against the best points defense in the NFL. - 07/02/2011 08:54:37 AM 713 Views
On a very short field all but one of the times they got into the end zone. - 07/02/2011 09:43:57 AM 709 Views
joel -- give it up - 07/02/2011 01:35:11 PM 656 Views
I didn't say they didn't win fair and square. - 07/02/2011 03:36:22 PM 666 Views
The Steelers lost because they couldn't move the ball on their last drive - 08/02/2011 01:58:28 PM 839 Views
I'm aware; I'm just not sure why that makes Aaron Rodgers the Most Valuable Player. - 08/02/2011 02:04:41 PM 694 Views
because he is the QB - 08/02/2011 03:23:23 PM 700 Views
So what? - 08/02/2011 03:39:15 PM 777 Views
didn't you call Romo a choker because he hasn't won the big games? - 08/02/2011 04:24:04 PM 784 Views
Because he's LOST big games as a direct result of things he actually DID. - 08/02/2011 04:56:00 PM 740 Views
and - 08/02/2011 05:17:49 PM 824 Views
i think joel's problem is less the west coast offense and more his disdain for all things packers - 07/02/2011 01:33:10 PM 646 Views
There's enough hatred in my heart for both the Packers and the WCO. - 07/02/2011 03:42:51 PM 743 Views
What Denver cheated talk? - 07/02/2011 07:44:39 PM 896 Views
All the talk about cut blocking being the same as chop blocking. - 08/02/2011 03:02:38 PM 861 Views
My persoanl preiction was the mirror opposite of the actual result. *NM* - 07/02/2011 03:31:08 AM 290 Views
I hate when that happens. - 07/02/2011 03:55:35 AM 674 Views
gghrhahrhghg! - 07/02/2011 04:08:17 AM 708 Views
For once we agree completely. - 07/02/2011 04:17:50 AM 896 Views
Actually we just beat the second coming... - 07/02/2011 04:23:46 AM 684 Views
I loathe both teams and their fans; I find Packers fans far more insufferably arrogant. - 07/02/2011 06:28:22 AM 714 Views
Super Bowls, Super Bowls, Super Bowls. - 07/02/2011 08:42:39 AM 744 Views
Pittsburgh isn't a large market? That matters since the Pack instituted drafts and profit sharing? - 07/02/2011 09:34:03 AM 723 Views
Quite true. We are significantly better than sliced bread. - 07/02/2011 07:34:57 PM 637 Views
I know which I prefer. - 08/02/2011 03:14:11 PM 761 Views
actually.... - 09/02/2011 01:37:54 AM 599 Views
oh, you're a cowboys fan again? - 07/02/2011 01:42:58 PM 686 Views
I never stopped being a Cowboys fan. - 07/02/2011 03:53:03 PM 710 Views
I was going for Steelers. - 07/02/2011 05:53:38 AM 588 Views
Aw, Pitt doesn't seem so bad... - 07/02/2011 06:29:09 AM 724 Views
I was going for Steelers. - 07/02/2011 05:53:38 AM 680 Views
Emphatically, it seems. - 07/02/2011 09:46:18 AM 660 Views
Re: Super Bowl XLV Pick 'Em: Pittsburgh Steelers vs. Green Bay Packers - 07/02/2011 12:08:10 PM 613 Views
Yick. - 08/02/2011 01:32:31 PM 601 Views
It's awesome because it's MST3K - 08/02/2011 05:01:17 PM 690 Views
HAHAHAHA!! - 09/02/2011 01:40:16 AM 762 Views
i'm gonna go out on another limb and pick the packers to win the super bowl! - 07/02/2011 01:32:32 PM 680 Views
Yeah, I kinda figured that went without saying. - 08/02/2011 01:39:17 PM 776 Views
Great game. - 07/02/2011 02:49:22 PM 576 Views
It was exciting, but I'm more inclined to agree with Palatine about the quality. - 08/02/2011 01:46:47 PM 790 Views
Re: It was exciting, but I'm more inclined to agree with Palatine about the quality. - 08/02/2011 02:32:53 PM 746 Views
Slo mo counts on replays; that's the point. - 08/02/2011 03:24:23 PM 671 Views
despise everything they represent??? - 09/02/2011 01:54:07 AM 781 Views
Re: Slo mo counts on replays; that's the point. - 09/02/2011 02:48:55 PM 1003 Views
I don't pick teams, I root for teams. - 07/02/2011 06:06:50 PM 530 Views

Reply to Message