Active Users:790 Time:30/01/2026 12:24:20 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Not sure if anyone else has asked this... Antigone Send a noteboard - 25/02/2011 01:19:08 PM
...but what about the school that allowed him to do this?

I have no kids, so I don't know how schools work these days. But did the school have the right to permit someone to video the kids without parental consent, regardless of what they thought the end result would be?

I realize this is a small town, probably with more relaxed regulations than a school in a big city...but still...

I was just curious if the school faced any possible issues for permitting it...
Antigone
*MySmiley*

Remember I was always true...Remember that I always tried
Remember I loved only you...Remember me and smile...
For it's better to forget
Than to remember me
And cry
Reply to message
musician jailed over youtube prank -- faces 20+years plus child porn charges moondog - 20/02/2011 07:55:33 AM 1198 Views
Yay for home! MrFarstrider - 20/02/2011 12:20:14 PM 746 Views
Re: Yay for home! everynametaken - 22/02/2011 05:05:49 AM 734 Views
Mmmm, there is more to it . At first I was thinking it was much ado about nothing. Tashmere - 20/02/2011 03:31:51 PM 979 Views
This explains what happened better and lets me feel a little mercy for the guy. Tashmere - 20/02/2011 03:59:41 PM 1075 Views
as stated, the children were never exposed to the "adult only" performance moondog - 20/02/2011 04:35:32 PM 751 Views
So I guess the moral of this story is think before you put things on the internet. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/02/2011 06:10:32 PM 287 Views
He should get the pants sued off him. Ghavrel - 20/02/2011 07:08:56 PM 648 Views
His only mistake was not getting them to sign something, allowing to be posted on youtube A Deathwatch Guard - 21/02/2011 01:51:30 AM 725 Views
kids don't have that right. The parents would have needed to sign. *NM* random thoughts - 21/02/2011 07:24:04 PM 309 Views
The lyrics were hilarious? The sample I read and posted had nothing funny in them...maybe you can Tashmere - 22/02/2011 12:35:05 AM 630 Views
Well ... from this parents perspective dart_board - 21/02/2011 12:33:25 PM 724 Views
Lol and people say human beings aren't civilized *NM* Dark Knight - 21/02/2011 05:32:32 PM 292 Views
Re: Lol and people say human beings aren't civilized dart_board - 22/02/2011 02:19:48 PM 658 Views
Stupid and in bad taste, but certainly not worth jail time *NM* ironclad - 21/02/2011 12:41:28 PM 301 Views
For using the childrens' faces without permission he could be sued for monetary damages. Tom - 21/02/2011 01:50:19 PM 759 Views
Re: For using the childrens' faces without permission he could be sued for monetary damages. moondog - 21/02/2011 03:46:48 PM 739 Views
Tashmere's first reply above has a sample of the lyrics and how they were cut with the video. *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 21/02/2011 03:58:35 PM 277 Views
Agreed, that's really the only thing I can see that he can be sued for here. *NM* Legolas - 25/02/2011 10:36:53 PM 263 Views
"Oh, I didn't actually abuse any of those kids." Sareitha Sedai - 21/02/2011 02:37:00 PM 669 Views
Agreed. But being an asshat is not a crime. *NM* Ghavrel - 21/02/2011 05:02:59 PM 266 Views
No, it's not. Sareitha Sedai - 21/02/2011 05:22:05 PM 745 Views
no but using children to create sexually explicit material is random thoughts - 21/02/2011 07:36:32 PM 755 Views
"sexually explicit material" is different than "obscene" moondog - 22/02/2011 02:43:49 AM 688 Views
That is debatable. Tashmere - 22/02/2011 05:25:46 AM 657 Views
you don't believe both can describe language? random thoughts - 22/02/2011 02:30:16 PM 622 Views
Yes, this was disgusting, but since when does dirty lyrics = porn? Aeryn - 22/02/2011 04:18:05 PM 726 Views
The written word can be considered porn so why not song lyrics? random thoughts - 22/02/2011 05:04:37 PM 666 Views
It can? Aeryn - 23/02/2011 04:34:40 AM 740 Views
Yep Isaac - 23/02/2011 05:04:49 AM 717 Views
Actually, obscenity is one of the most poorly defined concepts in US law. Ghavrel - 26/02/2011 09:57:21 PM 808 Views
Yes, I've posted on the Miller Test Isaac - 26/02/2011 10:54:11 PM 858 Views
Penthouse letters is porn random thoughts - 24/02/2011 12:52:31 AM 655 Views
Am I the only one thinking of The Exorcist here? Legolas - 25/02/2011 10:40:58 PM 799 Views
yes you are the only one thinking that *NM* random thoughts - 25/02/2011 11:33:53 PM 256 Views
You gotta admit it doesn't get much worse than that in terms of exposing children to obscenity. Legolas - 26/02/2011 12:13:46 AM 663 Views
I need say I don't think he should go to prison for twenty years random thoughts - 26/02/2011 07:30:17 PM 697 Views
Yes that is a name Bramhodoulos - 21/02/2011 09:04:19 PM 821 Views
Inappropriate of course but child porn? Give me a break! *NM* everynametaken - 22/02/2011 05:06:20 AM 329 Views
defamation maybe Aeryn - 22/02/2011 04:21:03 PM 610 Views
Not sure if anyone else has asked this... Antigone - 25/02/2011 01:19:08 PM 985 Views
kids are video taped all the time at schools random thoughts - 25/02/2011 02:05:38 PM 616 Views
School staff is one thing, outside sources are another. Avendesora - 25/02/2011 02:56:20 PM 701 Views
most states run background checks and this guy may have had one run on him random thoughts - 25/02/2011 03:19:58 PM 696 Views
he got permission from the teacher and the kids' parents before the original filming session moondog - 25/02/2011 03:20:30 PM 703 Views
they probably didn't think he would it to make a "funny" video random thoughts - 26/02/2011 07:43:59 PM 811 Views
show one example the song was about sex with children and I might agree *NM* moondog - 26/02/2011 09:23:44 PM 303 Views
If you try hard enough you can believe whatever you want random thoughts - 26/02/2011 10:09:45 PM 715 Views
and if you're determined to railroad someone none of the facts matter moondog - 26/02/2011 11:36:42 PM 864 Views
If I put out a video that had you giggling as I sung about cumming on your face you would be fine? random thoughts - 27/02/2011 09:09:25 PM 641 Views
of course not, but the 1st amendment says you have the right moondog - 27/02/2011 11:02:42 PM 612 Views
the courts ruled a long time ago that the 1st amendment does not cover all speech random thoughts - 28/02/2011 10:58:38 PM 832 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes