Active Users:585 Time:31/10/2026 04:06:04 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Fascinating that Alito should be the one to dissent. Legolas Send a noteboard - 03/03/2011 10:35:05 PM
As for the merits of the case, five million dollars is a ludicrous sum and symptomatic of everything that's wrong with the American justice system. But apart from that I'm inclined to side with Alito. It's beyond me why banning public sexual obscenity should be acceptable, while banning public obscenity of this nature isn't.
Reply to message
US Supreme Court allows anti-gay funeral protests everynametaken - 03/03/2011 04:55:52 AM 1091 Views
Honestly... good. *NM* beetnemesis - 03/03/2011 04:59:21 AM 306 Views
Yeah ... Darth_Katie - 03/03/2011 03:23:54 PM 709 Views
And it doesn't forbid content-neutral bans on funeral protests. Everyone wins. Ghavrel - 03/03/2011 08:53:20 AM 740 Views
Here's the problem Bad Ash - 03/03/2011 05:05:15 PM 792 Views
About time you came back, Shannon! Tashmere - 03/03/2011 11:42:39 PM 665 Views
Whoah, talk about jumping into the wayback machine! Avendesora - 04/03/2011 02:19:36 AM 741 Views
Fascinating that Alito should be the one to dissent. Legolas - 03/03/2011 10:35:05 PM 713 Views
I believe in siding with free speech but this one is hard random thoughts - 03/03/2011 10:58:04 PM 679 Views
No freaking kidding!!!! Exactly how I feel. Tashmere - 03/03/2011 11:38:54 PM 711 Views
Yes! *NM* @my - 04/03/2011 04:27:02 AM 298 Views
What a terrible ruling. The cliche is correct: interesting cases make for bad law. Tom - 04/03/2011 04:44:25 AM 694 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes