It's the same standard, whatever you choose to believe.
Joel Send a noteboard - 16/03/2011 09:08:01 PM
We have more context for the global warming guy than Rush. Now to be fair Rush is very likely putting the very worst spin he can come up with on this guys words. You two are kind of reverse polarity Twinkies in that regard. But I would like to know what "signs" the guy is talking about and the way he worded it does seem to imply that Mother Nature (notice the caps) was somehow involved.
He stated the signs he was talking about so you don't have to guess. Maybe I'm being too verbose and hard to follow again; snoop makes exactly the same point in response to Isaac, but as usual does it far more concisely. The other PARAGRAPHS in the mans statement clarify the single SENTENCE that would otherwise be so ambiguous as to be meaningless. Limbaughs comments are unambiguous; do you have or just really want to believe in a statement by him that changes that? Note that I'm not begging the question, because I'm referring to something we all know he said clearly.
Of course we could have just waited to have this whole discussion until someone blamed gays. I am really shocked that it hasn't happened yet.
Give Pat Robertson time.
Just don't complain around the Tea Party if he blames gays, or you might be shocked to learn you're a Muslim/terrorist.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 16/03/2011 at 09:20:14 PM
So, how many drugs is Rush Limbaugh actually on?
- 16/03/2011 08:30:25 AM
958 Views
Possibly different ones then the EESC president
- 16/03/2011 03:58:41 PM
897 Views
No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
- 16/03/2011 04:22:52 PM
667 Views
Tsunami and climate change
- 17/03/2011 11:59:36 PM
897 Views
"Speakers were careful to point out that many findings still amounted only to hypotheses"
- 18/03/2011 01:31:44 PM
811 Views
Re: No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
- 18/03/2011 12:25:01 PM
841 Views
Republican spin doctor Frank Luntz popularized "climate change" to make global warming appealing.
- 18/03/2011 01:56:01 PM
744 Views
A slightly misleading post
- 16/03/2011 07:41:46 PM
762 Views
Kind of missed the point there
- 16/03/2011 09:54:35 PM
769 Views
If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
- 16/03/2011 10:16:21 PM
637 Views
Re: If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
- 16/03/2011 10:44:56 PM
773 Views
" I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
- 16/03/2011 11:10:11 PM
781 Views
Re: " I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
- 16/03/2011 11:42:29 PM
610 Views
I've read the transcript
- 16/03/2011 10:34:41 PM
788 Views
Re: I've read the transcript
- 16/03/2011 10:46:42 PM
686 Views
You need to reread what I said
- 16/03/2011 10:49:45 PM
655 Views
No, I think you're still missing my point
- 16/03/2011 11:09:04 PM
734 Views
No. You don't get to say, "what he said doesn't matter because of how we learned of it".
- 16/03/2011 11:54:46 PM
712 Views
I think Republicans should stop using "legitimate". I do not think it means what they think it means
- 16/03/2011 04:11:14 PM
809 Views
there are enough carzies on the left to make things like this easy for Rush
- 16/03/2011 04:20:47 PM
729 Views
So it doesn't matter that no one said it as long as he can plausibly claim they did.
- 16/03/2011 06:58:17 PM
651 Views
well since it is taken out of context it is hard to say where Rush was going with it
- 16/03/2011 07:19:46 PM
748 Views
Um... he stated where he was going with it.
- 16/03/2011 07:30:02 PM
718 Views
At least you are not ashamed to use a double standard
- 16/03/2011 08:17:39 PM
661 Views
It's the same standard, whatever you choose to believe.
- 16/03/2011 09:08:01 PM
785 Views
I don't thinkit is as clear as you make it out to be
- 16/03/2011 09:31:53 PM
680 Views
It is not just "possible" he's talking about islands affected by global warming; he says it outright
- 16/03/2011 10:09:16 PM
852 Views
Sorry but I still fail to see how the islands he mention are a sign of what needs to be done
- 16/03/2011 10:27:20 PM
719 Views
Then you don't understand context and this whole discussion is pointless.
- 16/03/2011 11:28:47 PM
792 Views
lets throw a little context at asnd see if it matters
- 17/03/2011 12:12:03 AM
679 Views
Yes: It makes it worse.
- 17/03/2011 12:45:12 AM
684 Views
no it shows that the one statements was not meant to be taken literally
- 17/03/2011 02:47:55 AM
707 Views
At best, it shows he was joking about something he believes to be fact despite lacking evidence.
- 18/03/2011 02:24:45 PM
788 Views
so you finally agre that the context changes the meaning, took you long enough
- 18/03/2011 02:33:41 PM
659 Views

