Certainly, it's a dangerous game to begin playing with majors, but football is extracurricular. It's not like the art/lit people are being given scholarships to make macaroni sculptures in their spare time. They're learning painting techniques, art history, psychology, history, sociology, composition, etc...etc... all as part of their worthy/unworthy degree.

There's nothing academic about sports. Well there is, but those people are in degrees like kinesthesiology (sp?), sports medicine, etc... I mean that there is nothing academically related about actually playing football for the university. You don't take courses in throwing physics or Intro to Trauma Care or the airflow around a football in the air and how it affects optimal flight paths. I suppose you CAN, but it's not actually part of being a football player.

The ONLY difference in "worth" of varsity sports versus intramurals is that the varsity sports bring money in to the university, and varsity athletes get some academic perks like tutoring.


Even if you think it's "worthless", a liberal art major is still learning and involved in academics by virtue of being a liberal art major. A football player is involved in learning and academics by virtue of needing to be enrolled in the college in order to play. Removing sports from a school has no direct impact on its academics (beyond loss of money). Removing majors from a school is a direct influence on its academics.

Am I explaining this well? Do you get what I'm trying to say? I feel like I'm not :/