You basically just said what I said. How am I not right?
Tom Send a noteboard - 14/04/2011 05:56:08 PM
The only thing that you seem to have any issue with is my definition of "the rich". I can't imagine how people can say someone making $150,000 in a metropolitan area is rich. Perhaps someone making $150,000 in a rural area is "well off".
Furthermore, even if one were to assume that $150,000 IS rich, there is only so much more that can be marginally taken from those brackets. The middle class will have to get hit as well, so the conclusion remains the same regardless of the methodology one uses to arrive at the conclusion.
With respect to everything else you said, we agree.
Furthermore, even if one were to assume that $150,000 IS rich, there is only so much more that can be marginally taken from those brackets. The middle class will have to get hit as well, so the conclusion remains the same regardless of the methodology one uses to arrive at the conclusion.
With respect to everything else you said, we agree.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
How can anyone seriously support Obama's budget proposals?
- 14/04/2011 02:49:30 PM
1297 Views
I agree with your overall point but I do question one of your facts
- 14/04/2011 03:25:25 PM
775 Views
Using IRS data for 2008: (most recent year for which data is available)
- 14/04/2011 03:45:20 PM
801 Views
You didn't interpret the spreadsheet correctly. I'm positive of that.
- 14/04/2011 06:08:39 PM
655 Views
I'm gonna have to jump on board the wagon with that being a bad figure, got some others
- 14/04/2011 07:33:14 PM
855 Views
Data: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/08in31mt.xls *NM*
- 14/04/2011 08:32:42 PM
322 Views
That's a breakdown of who modifies their returns and how it affects revenue.
- 14/04/2011 09:15:21 PM
625 Views
*NM*
I believe you are questioning one of my definitions, not one of my facts.
- 14/04/2011 04:36:35 PM
707 Views
No matter how you define it I think it would be hard to call the top 5% middle class
- 14/04/2011 05:03:33 PM
726 Views
What a load of crap!
- 14/04/2011 03:49:29 PM
843 Views
Yes, your response is a load of crap.
- 14/04/2011 04:55:20 PM
810 Views
Re: Yes, your response is a load of crap.
- 14/04/2011 05:13:14 PM
854 Views
This is our first war without a tax increase.
- 14/04/2011 06:05:43 PM
773 Views
Er, check facts
- 14/04/2011 05:04:02 PM
941 Views
Yeah, lets fact check
- 14/04/2011 05:43:34 PM
791 Views
You understand you're actually supposed to cite data for a fact check right?
- 14/04/2011 06:38:22 PM
929 Views
I'm not sure thats entirely right
- 14/04/2011 05:51:18 PM
1019 Views
You basically just said what I said. How am I not right?
- 14/04/2011 05:56:08 PM
716 Views
What about the farm subsidies and the military?
- 15/04/2011 04:54:54 PM
708 Views
Cutting the military isn't enough
- 16/04/2011 04:27:11 AM
682 Views
Defense is 60% of the discretionary budget as well, so it's more like 26% overall. Just sayin'. *NM*
- 16/04/2011 04:53:30 AM
324 Views