Yes, my point was that giving legal definitions was a corruption of common sense.
Tom Send a noteboard - 16/04/2011 08:26:48 PM
Of course, our laws simply specify that one can't discriminate based on race, national origin, etc. rather than try to roll everything into one definition. Either way, the idea was that by citing a legal, rather than a natural, definition, you're distorting things.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
I have never EVER met kids this horrible
- 15/04/2011 05:14:06 AM
1763 Views
slapping might make him sillier? Sounds like the parents would enjoy that too? *NM*
- 15/04/2011 05:25:38 AM
438 Views
Welcome to children in a world run by liberals. *NM*
- 15/04/2011 05:51:46 AM
342 Views
I am gonna beat my childrens asses raw if they ever act like that *NM*
- 15/04/2011 06:25:54 AM
320 Views
That sounds extremely annoying. But less of the racism, if you don't mind.
- 15/04/2011 10:11:09 AM
754 Views
they are paki british if it helps *NM*
- 15/04/2011 04:11:39 PM
342 Views
... *NM*
- 15/04/2011 04:21:24 PM
331 Views
Re: Pretty much my reaction.
- 15/04/2011 07:26:22 PM
788 Views
"Paki" is used self-referentially in the States without being a slur. Cool your jets.
- 15/04/2011 08:07:26 PM
983 Views
- 15/04/2011 08:07:26 PM
983 Views
Wait, what?
- 15/04/2011 08:12:34 PM
839 Views
SILVER ON THE TREE. Bullies are tormenting a Sikh child on a bridge.
- 15/04/2011 08:40:46 PM
689 Views
Re: Why would you think that you know it's a slur in the UK, but I wouldn't?
- 15/04/2011 08:47:50 PM
703 Views
I was talking about Aisha, not you. I don't know where you live--I thought you were European.
- 15/04/2011 09:51:10 PM
753 Views
Re: Just to point out:
- 16/04/2011 01:28:01 AM
713 Views
Am I the only one who sees a difference in this?
- 16/04/2011 01:49:49 AM
856 Views
Obviously killing people is worse than calling them names.
- 16/04/2011 08:29:22 AM
692 Views
I think that makes various forms of discrimination less serious.
- 17/04/2011 01:28:37 AM
667 Views
39 views? It's been like four minutes! STOP USING INTERNET EXPLORER, PEOPLE. *NM*
- 17/04/2011 01:40:45 AM
308 Views
Much less than you'd think, given that is considered racist over here in the UK unlike the US. *NM*
- 15/04/2011 04:26:54 PM
275 Views
Even aside from the use of the word "Paki"...
- 15/04/2011 07:36:41 PM
684 Views
Well, they aren't racially British, so "anti-British racism" is by definition inapplicable here.
- 15/04/2011 08:04:36 PM
760 Views
Methinks you have a rather narrow definition of "race".
- 15/04/2011 11:14:51 PM
965 Views
No, you just distorted the word "race" out of all recognition for legal definition purposes.
- 16/04/2011 12:39:26 AM
699 Views
Does the existence of a British race even exist by that definition?
*NM*
- 16/04/2011 01:44:38 AM
293 Views
*NM*
- 16/04/2011 01:44:38 AM
293 Views
By giving... its legal definition in the UK! (At least for the purposes of the Equality Act.)
- 16/04/2011 08:51:58 AM
819 Views
Yes, my point was that giving legal definitions was a corruption of common sense.
- 16/04/2011 08:26:48 PM
672 Views
It doesn't sound very natural to me to say "OMG you're being nationalityist!"
*NM*
- 17/04/2011 12:13:41 AM
454 Views
*NM*
- 17/04/2011 12:13:41 AM
454 Views
Re: You do know you're getting no cookies for this line of discussion.
*NM*
- 17/04/2011 01:31:24 AM
515 Views
*NM*
- 17/04/2011 01:31:24 AM
515 Views


