Have you ever looked at those projections for a decade or two hence?
Legolas Send a noteboard - 16/04/2011 10:13:12 PM
I dont understand how it remains a problem if you have enough revenue to cover it. So called "entitlement problem" is the problem only if you don't have money to pay for it. Otherwise, it's not a problem.
Even if you suppose you can raise tax revenue by cutting loopholes and forcing large companies to pay more taxes - whether that'll work or have the desired effect is another question, and one I don't feel particularly qualified to answer - it would only give you a little bit of respite. Social Security and Medicare are set on a growth path that will rapidly make them take up such huge parts of the budget that adjustments in other parts of the budget will make little difference. One way or another, the growth of those two programs has to be radically slowed down - or else the government will rapidly find itself unable to fund other important services. And frankly, I'm not sure merely cutting back waste and fraud will be enough.
Several basics facts about US Debt and Spending.....
- 16/04/2011 04:41:55 AM
1329 Views
- 16/04/2011 04:41:55 AM
1329 Views
Guess we should have okay'd those death panels for old people then. Big money saver.
*NM*
- 16/04/2011 03:38:00 PM
443 Views
*NM*
- 16/04/2011 03:38:00 PM
443 Views
Balancing our budget would be easy.
- 16/04/2011 06:46:32 PM
799 Views
Several of those aren't as easy as you make it sound, but the import tax is a big no-no.
- 16/04/2011 07:34:30 PM
1014 Views
Also on the buying drugs from Canada idea
- 16/04/2011 08:17:26 PM
902 Views
Funny you mentioned WWII and 1968. Can you put tax rates at these times as well?
- 16/04/2011 07:50:09 PM
1267 Views
Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains. *NM*
- 16/04/2011 08:25:26 PM
385 Views
Re: Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains.
- 16/04/2011 09:19:40 PM
933 Views
Have you ever looked at those projections for a decade or two hence?
- 16/04/2011 10:13:12 PM
894 Views
Yes I have
- 16/04/2011 10:44:50 PM
1037 Views
Erm, and you think total health care spending is not getting out of control? I'm a little confused.
- 16/04/2011 11:02:52 PM
950 Views
Exactly. Cutting back on fraud and waste doesn't really put much of a dent in those projections. *NM*
- 17/04/2011 02:31:13 AM
363 Views
Sorry, but that is a stupid opinion.....
- 16/04/2011 08:38:35 PM
860 Views
Sounds like another bull.
- 16/04/2011 09:31:05 PM
1124 Views
Dude, the data is the data.....tax revenue increased all three times.
- 16/04/2011 09:47:37 PM
1085 Views
As I suspected, it's a bull.
- 16/04/2011 10:02:05 PM
999 Views
Stop being a fool - read and react to the data provided, posting something.....
- 16/04/2011 10:14:11 PM
743 Views
Response is
- 16/04/2011 10:19:00 PM
958 Views
Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
- 16/04/2011 10:28:44 PM
958 Views
Re: Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
- 16/04/2011 10:47:24 PM
916 Views
I take it you mean "rate of revenue growth decreases".
- 16/04/2011 11:11:19 PM
851 Views
It's not remarkable that revenue increased after the Reagan cuts.
- 17/04/2011 07:21:47 PM
1155 Views
I've just noticed that you've provided charts from Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me?
- 16/04/2011 10:13:46 PM
844 Views
All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
- 16/04/2011 10:16:08 PM
858 Views
Re: All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
- 16/04/2011 10:27:01 PM
968 Views
Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
- 16/04/2011 10:35:44 PM
783 Views
Re: Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
- 16/04/2011 10:49:33 PM
932 Views
Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
- 17/04/2011 02:34:50 AM
787 Views
Re: Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
- 17/04/2011 03:50:24 AM
1016 Views
Some obesrvations by Republican economists
- 18/04/2011 12:27:04 AM
1150 Views
You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
- 18/04/2011 04:00:52 PM
800 Views
Re: You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
- 18/04/2011 05:36:44 PM
783 Views
You use Krugman and then complain about the Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me? *NM*
- 18/04/2011 02:46:47 AM
401 Views


