.....different is not a response.
Go back to my post, look at the CBO data, and in your words, tell me what you think.
Hint: saying that you were wrong and that spending is the real problem is the correct reply.
Last try.....
Go back to my post, look at the CBO data, and in your words, tell me what you think.
Hint: saying that you were wrong and that spending is the real problem is the correct reply.
Last try.....
Revenue grows per capita:
1973-1979: 2.7%
1979-1990: 1.8%
1990-2000: 3.2%
2000-2007 (probable peak): approximately zero
Several basics facts about US Debt and Spending.....
- 16/04/2011 04:41:55 AM
1327 Views
- 16/04/2011 04:41:55 AM
1327 Views
Guess we should have okay'd those death panels for old people then. Big money saver.
*NM*
- 16/04/2011 03:38:00 PM
443 Views
*NM*
- 16/04/2011 03:38:00 PM
443 Views
Balancing our budget would be easy.
- 16/04/2011 06:46:32 PM
797 Views
Several of those aren't as easy as you make it sound, but the import tax is a big no-no.
- 16/04/2011 07:34:30 PM
1014 Views
Also on the buying drugs from Canada idea
- 16/04/2011 08:17:26 PM
902 Views
Funny you mentioned WWII and 1968. Can you put tax rates at these times as well?
- 16/04/2011 07:50:09 PM
1267 Views
Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains. *NM*
- 16/04/2011 08:25:26 PM
385 Views
Re: Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains.
- 16/04/2011 09:19:40 PM
931 Views
Have you ever looked at those projections for a decade or two hence?
- 16/04/2011 10:13:12 PM
893 Views
Yes I have
- 16/04/2011 10:44:50 PM
1036 Views
Erm, and you think total health care spending is not getting out of control? I'm a little confused.
- 16/04/2011 11:02:52 PM
950 Views
Exactly. Cutting back on fraud and waste doesn't really put much of a dent in those projections. *NM*
- 17/04/2011 02:31:13 AM
362 Views
Sorry, but that is a stupid opinion.....
- 16/04/2011 08:38:35 PM
859 Views
Sounds like another bull.
- 16/04/2011 09:31:05 PM
1123 Views
Dude, the data is the data.....tax revenue increased all three times.
- 16/04/2011 09:47:37 PM
1085 Views
As I suspected, it's a bull.
- 16/04/2011 10:02:05 PM
997 Views
Stop being a fool - read and react to the data provided, posting something.....
- 16/04/2011 10:14:11 PM
743 Views
Response is
- 16/04/2011 10:19:00 PM
958 Views
Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
- 16/04/2011 10:28:44 PM
956 Views
Re: Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
- 16/04/2011 10:47:24 PM
916 Views
I take it you mean "rate of revenue growth decreases".
- 16/04/2011 11:11:19 PM
851 Views
It's not remarkable that revenue increased after the Reagan cuts.
- 17/04/2011 07:21:47 PM
1154 Views
I've just noticed that you've provided charts from Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me?
- 16/04/2011 10:13:46 PM
843 Views
All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
- 16/04/2011 10:16:08 PM
858 Views
Re: All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
- 16/04/2011 10:27:01 PM
968 Views
Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
- 16/04/2011 10:35:44 PM
781 Views
Re: Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
- 16/04/2011 10:49:33 PM
930 Views
Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
- 17/04/2011 02:34:50 AM
786 Views
Re: Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
- 17/04/2011 03:50:24 AM
1016 Views
Some obesrvations by Republican economists
- 18/04/2011 12:27:04 AM
1150 Views
You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
- 18/04/2011 04:00:52 PM
800 Views
Re: You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
- 18/04/2011 05:36:44 PM
781 Views
You use Krugman and then complain about the Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me? *NM*
- 18/04/2011 02:46:47 AM
401 Views


