Under the Freedom of Information Act citizens have a right to any government document not covered by security exceptions. We have been informed that the raid took place and bin Laden was killed, so there is no secrecy threatened by releasing the picture. Using a vague "national security" excuse in this instance is just a bad, bad precedent to not disclosing anything the government doesn't want to disclose on theoretical grounds of "national security".
Dude, there is a security secrecy that would come to light. No one is supposed to know that Charlie Sheen is actually the guy that fired the shot that killed Osama. Personally, I have no desire to see Charlie Sheen holding a gun in one hand, a whiskey in the other with his foot on Osama's chest and a cigar in Charlie's mouth.
Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.
My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
His head on a spike?
04/05/2011 06:51:25 PM
- 1701 Views
They'll probably leak out and be all over the internet regardless of what he does
04/05/2011 07:56:22 PM
- 1125 Views
No.
04/05/2011 08:31:47 PM
- 1126 Views
Damn I posted as excalibur again
04/05/2011 08:32:43 PM
- 940 Views

But how do we know you're not excalibur pretending to be Avienda?
04/05/2011 08:40:17 PM
- 1106 Views
Or me, pretending to be you?
04/05/2011 09:56:06 PM
- 1031 Views
Sorry, I'm such a jerkface for doing that
*NM*
04/05/2011 10:06:15 PM
- 953 Views

I vote yes. We should have release the pictures.
04/05/2011 09:38:37 PM
- 1151 Views
Is it about us?
04/05/2011 09:48:41 PM
- 1076 Views
If the photo exists, it should be released. Period.
04/05/2011 10:31:09 PM
- 1206 Views
I'm not sure that tells me why.
04/05/2011 10:41:15 PM
- 1084 Views
I don't believe in censorship of anything that doesn't need to be censored. Period. *NM*
05/05/2011 03:50:28 PM
- 616 Views
That isn't the statement I saw from Obama,
04/05/2011 10:55:57 PM
- 1029 Views
He always gives a bullshit reason for what he does. *NM*
05/05/2011 03:17:28 AM
- 564 Views
So, you think "you're too delicate" is a less-bullshit reason?
05/05/2011 03:22:16 AM
- 1165 Views
No. It's even more bullshit. There is no good reason to keep the photos confidential. *NM*
05/05/2011 03:51:08 PM
- 578 Views
Heh. Ok. So says you, so it must be. *NM*
05/05/2011 05:12:33 PM
- 614 Views
Is it that you think there is no risk of increased attacks against Western soldiers/ innocent
05/05/2011 09:54:42 AM
- 1048 Views
Due to showing the picture? No. Due to killing bin Laden? Yes. *NM*
05/05/2011 02:20:55 PM
- 579 Views
That is exactly how I feel. I have found it disturbing how many people want to see those pictures.
05/05/2011 04:05:22 AM
- 1142 Views
If it exists, you should be able to consume it?
05/05/2011 05:59:51 PM
- 1144 Views
It is a government document and we know of its existence, so YES, as a citizen I have a right to it.
05/05/2011 06:21:00 PM
- 1003 Views
Eh.
06/05/2011 02:24:41 PM
- 972 Views
I think that is the answer that people were looking for from you. I may not like it still, but it
10/05/2011 03:44:14 AM
- 1034 Views
I don't think releasing it is a very big deal, but I support his decision
04/05/2011 11:21:04 PM
- 1031 Views
For a complete sense of closure, to say it's done and move on without looking back, I say yea.
05/05/2011 05:33:31 AM
- 1078 Views