Under the Freedom of Information Act citizens have a right to any government document not covered by security exceptions. We have been informed that the raid took place and bin Laden was killed, so there is no secrecy threatened by releasing the picture. Using a vague "national security" excuse in this instance is just a bad, bad precedent to not disclosing anything the government doesn't want to disclose on theoretical grounds of "national security".
Dude, there is a security secrecy that would come to light. No one is supposed to know that Charlie Sheen is actually the guy that fired the shot that killed Osama. Personally, I have no desire to see Charlie Sheen holding a gun in one hand, a whiskey in the other with his foot on Osama's chest and a cigar in Charlie's mouth.
Your mom. That's right. The cat is out of the bag. Your mom.
My mind isn't always in the gutter, it just has VIP access
His head on a spike?
- 04/05/2011 06:51:25 PM
1970 Views
They'll probably leak out and be all over the internet regardless of what he does
- 04/05/2011 07:56:22 PM
1379 Views
No.
- 04/05/2011 08:31:47 PM
1406 Views
Damn I posted as excalibur again
- 04/05/2011 08:32:43 PM
1187 Views
- 04/05/2011 08:32:43 PM
1187 Views
But how do we know you're not excalibur pretending to be Avienda?
- 04/05/2011 08:40:17 PM
1358 Views
Or me, pretending to be you?
- 04/05/2011 09:56:06 PM
1299 Views
Sorry, I'm such a jerkface for doing that
*NM*
- 04/05/2011 10:06:15 PM
1203 Views
*NM*
- 04/05/2011 10:06:15 PM
1203 Views
I vote yes. We should have release the pictures.
- 04/05/2011 09:38:37 PM
1395 Views
Is it about us?
- 04/05/2011 09:48:41 PM
1335 Views
If the photo exists, it should be released. Period.
- 04/05/2011 10:31:09 PM
1463 Views
I'm not sure that tells me why.
- 04/05/2011 10:41:15 PM
1365 Views
I don't believe in censorship of anything that doesn't need to be censored. Period. *NM*
- 05/05/2011 03:50:28 PM
768 Views
That isn't the statement I saw from Obama,
- 04/05/2011 10:55:57 PM
1289 Views
He always gives a bullshit reason for what he does. *NM*
- 05/05/2011 03:17:28 AM
706 Views
So, you think "you're too delicate" is a less-bullshit reason?
- 05/05/2011 03:22:16 AM
1391 Views
No. It's even more bullshit. There is no good reason to keep the photos confidential. *NM*
- 05/05/2011 03:51:08 PM
697 Views
Heh. Ok. So says you, so it must be. *NM*
- 05/05/2011 05:12:33 PM
740 Views
Is it that you think there is no risk of increased attacks against Western soldiers/ innocent
- 05/05/2011 09:54:42 AM
1313 Views
Due to showing the picture? No. Due to killing bin Laden? Yes. *NM*
- 05/05/2011 02:20:55 PM
691 Views
That is exactly how I feel. I have found it disturbing how many people want to see those pictures.
- 05/05/2011 04:05:22 AM
1394 Views
If it exists, you should be able to consume it?
- 05/05/2011 05:59:51 PM
1411 Views
It is a government document and we know of its existence, so YES, as a citizen I have a right to it.
- 05/05/2011 06:21:00 PM
1255 Views
Eh.
- 06/05/2011 02:24:41 PM
1217 Views
I think that is the answer that people were looking for from you. I may not like it still, but it
- 10/05/2011 03:44:14 AM
1267 Views
I don't think releasing it is a very big deal, but I support his decision
- 04/05/2011 11:21:04 PM
1307 Views
For a complete sense of closure, to say it's done and move on without looking back, I say yea.
- 05/05/2011 05:33:31 AM
1344 Views

*NM*
*NM*
*NM*