try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM
The fourth amendment gives you the right to not be searched or have your property searched or taken without proper legal justification. Being followed either electronically or in person does neither of those things. There is no difference in the knowledge they would gain between following physically or electronically so there should be no difference it in your expectation of privacy.
secret GPS tracking upheld as legal practice
16/05/2011 02:37:14 PM
- 898 Views
How do they expect honest criminals to make a living with rules like this?
16/05/2011 06:24:45 PM
- 517 Views
sure this example is about convicted robbers
16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM
- 477 Views
I will have a problem when I see innocent people being targeted for no reason
16/05/2011 09:17:22 PM
- 471 Views
so get a warrant if these guys are such threats to society
17/05/2011 12:57:51 AM
- 467 Views
once again privacy takes place in private not in public. That is sorta where the word comes from
17/05/2011 02:23:05 PM
- 481 Views
the constitution guarantees the right of privacy to all, not just law abiding citizens
16/05/2011 09:14:24 PM
- 473 Views
where does it say that? It should be real easy to point to since it is in the constiution
16/05/2011 09:21:19 PM
- 527 Views
4th amendment
17/05/2011 12:55:00 AM
- 516 Views
Re: 4th amendment
17/05/2011 03:13:13 AM
- 476 Views
Re: 4th amendment
17/05/2011 03:28:36 AM
- 503 Views
Re: 4th amendment
17/05/2011 03:58:49 AM
- 475 Views
try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it
17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM
- 490 Views
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM*
17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM
- 241 Views
how is different if it is done by GPS or tailing them in a car? *NM*
17/05/2011 10:00:53 PM
- 196 Views
it's not different -- if they get a warrant first
18/05/2011 01:50:13 AM
- 482 Views