Active Users:2358 Time:19/06/2026 03:40:38 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: 4th amendment moondog Send a noteboard - 17/05/2011 09:19:09 PM

Its really no different from them just following you around. I would rather them do it more efficiently with a GPS than waste man hours and gas and what not on someone following these guys. Same principle.


you're right on the first point, it's no different than following someone around. the difference being: one time it will be you for no other reason than they have the power now.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
secret GPS tracking upheld as legal practice moondog - 16/05/2011 02:37:14 PM 1035 Views
How do they expect honest criminals to make a living with rules like this? random thoughts - 16/05/2011 06:24:45 PM 613 Views
sure this example is about convicted robbers Aisha - 16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM 576 Views
I will have a problem when I see innocent people being targeted for no reason random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:17:22 PM 583 Views
so get a warrant if these guys are such threats to society moondog - 17/05/2011 12:57:51 AM 572 Views
once again privacy takes place in private not in public. That is sorta where the word comes from random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 586 Views
checks and balances moondog - 17/05/2011 09:22:13 PM 620 Views
no the police can follow you around without probable cause random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:09:57 PM 571 Views
the constitution guarantees the right of privacy to all, not just law abiding citizens moondog - 16/05/2011 09:14:24 PM 574 Views
where does it say that? It should be real easy to point to since it is in the constiution random thoughts - 16/05/2011 09:21:19 PM 632 Views
4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 12:55:00 AM 614 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:13:13 AM 577 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 03:28:36 AM 604 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:58:49 AM 578 Views
Re: 4th amendment moondog - 17/05/2011 09:19:09 PM 581 Views
Re: 4th amendment callandor1000 - 21/05/2011 05:47:43 AM 557 Views
try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it random thoughts - 17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM 591 Views
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM* moondog - 17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM 280 Views
Because it's surveillance when they're in public. Sareitha Sedai - 17/05/2011 09:31:02 PM 617 Views
The kiddies still call it weed. *NM* Ghavrel - 18/05/2011 12:08:26 AM 247 Views
your example does not quite work for this situation moondog - 18/05/2011 01:49:02 AM 594 Views
how is different if it is done by GPS or tailing them in a car? *NM* random thoughts - 17/05/2011 10:00:53 PM 238 Views
it's not different -- if they get a warrant first moondog - 18/05/2011 01:50:13 AM 583 Views
OK I will use smaller words random thoughts - 18/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 614 Views
spelling it out for you moondog - 18/05/2011 04:18:45 PM 678 Views
I'm happy with it. *NM* callandor1000 - 17/05/2011 03:04:42 AM 374 Views
Molestation Knightscape - 18/05/2011 04:22:19 AM 801 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes