Active Users:885 Time:21/03/2026 03:38:35 AM
checks and balances moondog Send a noteboard - 17/05/2011 09:22:13 PM
I know you hate the cops and all but try and use some rational thought. How is this different that the police just following you? What information can they get from this that they couldn't get from following you? The method changes nothing. Do you object to police trailing people they suspect to see what they are doing? At please cool it with the silly "get warrant before you investigate" noise. They have to investigate in order to get a warrant to actually invade your privacy because despite the paranoia on the fringes of society they can't get warrants without some evidence to support it.


the warrant system exists for precisely this reason: it's not ok for the police to just track your every move without probable cause. these guys in this situation had probable cause or else they wouldn't have been tracked. so it should not have been too much of a big deal for the police to get a warrant in this case. do you not understand that this is an erosion of your own rights as a citizen of the US to let this practice exist without the warrant?
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
secret GPS tracking upheld as legal practice - 16/05/2011 02:37:14 PM 991 Views
How do they expect honest criminals to make a living with rules like this? - 16/05/2011 06:24:45 PM 572 Views
sure this example is about convicted robbers - 16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM 539 Views
I will have a problem when I see innocent people being targeted for no reason - 16/05/2011 09:17:22 PM 549 Views
so get a warrant if these guys are such threats to society - 17/05/2011 12:57:51 AM 535 Views
once again privacy takes place in private not in public. That is sorta where the word comes from - 17/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 548 Views
checks and balances - 17/05/2011 09:22:13 PM 586 Views
no the police can follow you around without probable cause - 17/05/2011 10:09:57 PM 536 Views
the constitution guarantees the right of privacy to all, not just law abiding citizens - 16/05/2011 09:14:24 PM 539 Views
where does it say that? It should be real easy to point to since it is in the constiution - 16/05/2011 09:21:19 PM 594 Views
4th amendment - 17/05/2011 12:55:00 AM 578 Views
Re: 4th amendment - 17/05/2011 03:13:13 AM 538 Views
Re: 4th amendment - 17/05/2011 03:28:36 AM 569 Views
Re: 4th amendment - 17/05/2011 03:58:49 AM 544 Views
Re: 4th amendment - 17/05/2011 09:19:09 PM 548 Views
Re: 4th amendment - 21/05/2011 05:47:43 AM 522 Views
try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it - 17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM 552 Views
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM* - 17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM 268 Views
Because it's surveillance when they're in public. - 17/05/2011 09:31:02 PM 583 Views
The kiddies still call it weed. *NM* - 18/05/2011 12:08:26 AM 233 Views
your example does not quite work for this situation - 18/05/2011 01:49:02 AM 558 Views
how is different if it is done by GPS or tailing them in a car? *NM* - 17/05/2011 10:00:53 PM 224 Views
it's not different -- if they get a warrant first - 18/05/2011 01:50:13 AM 552 Views
OK I will use smaller words - 18/05/2011 02:23:05 PM 578 Views
spelling it out for you - 18/05/2011 04:18:45 PM 640 Views
I'm happy with it. *NM* - 17/05/2011 03:04:42 AM 361 Views
Molestation - 18/05/2011 04:22:19 AM 765 Views

Reply to Message