Active Users:2195 Time:18/06/2026 09:20:58 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM
...that if you go to a random Wikipedia page, and continually click the first link in the article that is NOT in parentheses or italics, and repeat, you eventually end up in "Philosophy."


As far as I can tell, it's because nearly all articles start with the format "X is a insert genre or classification of X here." Each topic gets progressively broader, until you start getting into stuff like "What is knowledge? What is existence?" which leads to Philosophy.


Although, as Camilla pointed out, someone has sabotaged this by editing the "Fact" entry, so it loops back to "Information," which leads back to "Fact" after a few entries.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
So, how many have tried the claim in today's xkcd text? Camilla - 25/05/2011 05:39:55 PM 1188 Views
I did. Kaldric - 25/05/2011 06:13:05 PM 871 Views
Apparently i have a different xkcd.. MightyYT - 25/05/2011 06:38:14 PM 793 Views
They're talking about the rollover text *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM 371 Views
I never knew there was roll over text on xkcd. Yeah for more enjoyment of xkcd! *NM* MightyYT - 25/05/2011 07:18:27 PM 392 Views
So you've missed half the jokes on xkcd? *NM* jh - 25/05/2011 09:14:50 PM 334 Views
Indeed Camilla - 25/05/2011 11:00:38 PM 751 Views
Hahah oh wow! Rollover text is basically just as important to xkcd beetnemesis - 26/05/2011 04:41:42 AM 773 Views
Dang. The roll over is the best part in many cases. *NM* Hobo - 26/05/2011 07:44:43 PM 390 Views
Me! Monique - 25/05/2011 07:22:50 PM 1034 Views
Yeah. Someone sabotaged the "Facts" article beetnemesis - 25/05/2011 07:29:45 PM 834 Views
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... beetnemesis - 25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM 825 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... Camilla - 25/05/2011 10:58:02 PM 801 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... moondog - 26/05/2011 02:42:10 AM 761 Views
Ferenc Puskas didn't work. Stephen - 25/05/2011 07:39:31 PM 788 Views
For the future, it would be helpful to cite what you're talking about. Not all of us read xkcd. Tom - 25/05/2011 08:23:15 PM 879 Views
If you find it retarded, why do you care? *NM* Helene - 25/05/2011 09:22:49 PM 377 Views
... only it isn't [retarded] *NM* Aeryn - 25/05/2011 10:23:59 PM 442 Views
It's gotten pretty bad. The science jokes are funny, but Randall doesn't know much of anything else. *NM* Ghavrel - 26/05/2011 01:18:19 AM 371 Views
Even the science jokes are kinda meh Isaac - 26/05/2011 01:43:22 AM 823 Views
I loved xkcd up until about a year ago. Aemon - 26/05/2011 04:07:04 AM 823 Views
I should have clarified that it did seem good a few years ago. I agree with that. *NM* Tom - 26/05/2011 04:55:37 AM 344 Views
... *NM* Camilla - 25/05/2011 11:27:59 PM 353 Views
*NM* globug0822 - 26/05/2011 06:50:49 AM 373 Views
Took 23 or so clicks... globug0822 - 26/05/2011 06:50:01 AM 825 Views
I thought about it, but didn't dare. Joel - 26/05/2011 06:14:45 PM 860 Views
Huh. Hobo - 26/05/2011 07:50:31 PM 841 Views
Re: Huh. Camilla - 26/05/2011 09:21:26 PM 867 Views
Random words I see around the house... Danu - 26/05/2011 08:05:05 PM 789 Views
Not me. aerocontrols - 26/05/2011 11:18:57 PM 797 Views
It worked this time! *NM* Monique - 30/05/2011 10:10:47 PM 520 Views
Yes, I think someone fixed it back to the way it was. *NM* Camilla - 30/05/2011 10:12:29 PM 372 Views
At first I thought you meant today's comic. Tim - 30/05/2011 11:16:54 PM 1152 Views
That would have been very impressive Camilla - 30/05/2011 11:42:35 PM 839 Views
Yes, I noticed the date shortly afterwards. Tim - 31/05/2011 08:42:27 AM 773 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes