It was fairly cool. I tested Sherlock Holmes, lilac, Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams, and all came in between 10 and 24. And then someone seems to have sabotaged it by editing the mathematics pages, it seems, so now there is a loop.
Formally known as patternweaver.
So, how many have tried the claim in today's xkcd text?
- 25/05/2011 05:39:55 PM
1165 Views
I did.
- 25/05/2011 06:13:05 PM
847 Views
Apparently i have a different xkcd..
- 25/05/2011 06:38:14 PM
774 Views
They're talking about the rollover text
*NM*
- 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM
358 Views
*NM*
- 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM
358 Views
I never knew there was roll over text on xkcd. Yeah for more enjoyment of xkcd! *NM*
- 25/05/2011 07:18:27 PM
382 Views
Hahah oh wow! Rollover text is basically just as important to xkcd
- 26/05/2011 04:41:42 AM
752 Views
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is...
- 25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM
801 Views
For the future, it would be helpful to cite what you're talking about. Not all of us read xkcd.
- 25/05/2011 08:23:15 PM
858 Views
... only it isn't [retarded] *NM*
- 25/05/2011 10:23:59 PM
429 Views
It's gotten pretty bad. The science jokes are funny, but Randall doesn't know much of anything else. *NM*
- 26/05/2011 01:18:19 AM
359 Views
Even the science jokes are kinda meh
- 26/05/2011 01:43:22 AM
799 Views
I loved xkcd up until about a year ago.
- 26/05/2011 04:07:04 AM
807 Views
I should have clarified that it did seem good a few years ago. I agree with that. *NM*
- 26/05/2011 04:55:37 AM
333 Views
It worked this time! *NM*
- 30/05/2011 10:10:47 PM
511 Views
At first I thought you meant today's comic.
- 30/05/2011 11:16:54 PM
1128 Views

*NM*