It was fairly cool. I tested Sherlock Holmes, lilac, Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams, and all came in between 10 and 24. And then someone seems to have sabotaged it by editing the mathematics pages, it seems, so now there is a loop.
Formally known as patternweaver.
So, how many have tried the claim in today's xkcd text?
- 25/05/2011 05:39:55 PM
1188 Views
I did.
- 25/05/2011 06:13:05 PM
871 Views
Apparently i have a different xkcd..
- 25/05/2011 06:38:14 PM
792 Views
They're talking about the rollover text
*NM*
- 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM
370 Views
*NM*
- 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM
370 Views
I never knew there was roll over text on xkcd. Yeah for more enjoyment of xkcd! *NM*
- 25/05/2011 07:18:27 PM
392 Views
Hahah oh wow! Rollover text is basically just as important to xkcd
- 26/05/2011 04:41:42 AM
773 Views
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is...
- 25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM
824 Views
For the future, it would be helpful to cite what you're talking about. Not all of us read xkcd.
- 25/05/2011 08:23:15 PM
879 Views
... only it isn't [retarded] *NM*
- 25/05/2011 10:23:59 PM
442 Views
It's gotten pretty bad. The science jokes are funny, but Randall doesn't know much of anything else. *NM*
- 26/05/2011 01:18:19 AM
371 Views
Even the science jokes are kinda meh
- 26/05/2011 01:43:22 AM
822 Views
I loved xkcd up until about a year ago.
- 26/05/2011 04:07:04 AM
822 Views
I should have clarified that it did seem good a few years ago. I agree with that. *NM*
- 26/05/2011 04:55:37 AM
344 Views
It worked this time! *NM*
- 30/05/2011 10:10:47 PM
520 Views
At first I thought you meant today's comic.
- 30/05/2011 11:16:54 PM
1152 Views

*NM*