Active Users:270 Time:03/05/2024 05:42:21 PM
It worked this time! *NM* Monique Send a noteboard - 30/05/2011 10:10:47 PM
It was fairly cool. I tested Sherlock Holmes, lilac, Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams, and all came in between 10 and 24. And then someone seems to have sabotaged it by editing the mathematics pages, it seems, so now there is a loop.
Formally known as patternweaver.
Reply to message
So, how many have tried the claim in today's xkcd text? - 25/05/2011 05:39:55 PM 930 Views
I did. - 25/05/2011 06:13:05 PM 578 Views
Apparently i have a different xkcd.. - 25/05/2011 06:38:14 PM 521 Views
They're talking about the rollover text *NM* - 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM 255 Views
I never knew there was roll over text on xkcd. Yeah for more enjoyment of xkcd! *NM* - 25/05/2011 07:18:27 PM 279 Views
So you've missed half the jokes on xkcd? *NM* - 25/05/2011 09:14:50 PM 219 Views
Indeed - 25/05/2011 11:00:38 PM 465 Views
Hahah oh wow! Rollover text is basically just as important to xkcd - 26/05/2011 04:41:42 AM 503 Views
Dang. The roll over is the best part in many cases. *NM* - 26/05/2011 07:44:43 PM 269 Views
Me! - 25/05/2011 07:22:50 PM 668 Views
Yeah. Someone sabotaged the "Facts" article - 25/05/2011 07:29:45 PM 545 Views
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... - 25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM 544 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... - 25/05/2011 10:58:02 PM 515 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... - 26/05/2011 02:42:10 AM 483 Views
Ferenc Puskas didn't work. - 25/05/2011 07:39:31 PM 492 Views
For the future, it would be helpful to cite what you're talking about. Not all of us read xkcd. - 25/05/2011 08:23:15 PM 597 Views
If you find it retarded, why do you care? *NM* - 25/05/2011 09:22:49 PM 263 Views
... only it isn't [retarded] *NM* - 25/05/2011 10:23:59 PM 316 Views
... *NM* - 25/05/2011 11:27:59 PM 236 Views
*NM* - 26/05/2011 06:50:49 AM 255 Views
Took 23 or so clicks... - 26/05/2011 06:50:01 AM 530 Views
I thought about it, but didn't dare. - 26/05/2011 06:14:45 PM 585 Views
Huh. - 26/05/2011 07:50:31 PM 571 Views
Re: Huh. - 26/05/2011 09:21:26 PM 590 Views
Random words I see around the house... - 26/05/2011 08:05:05 PM 500 Views
Not me. - 26/05/2011 11:18:57 PM 509 Views
It worked this time! *NM* - 30/05/2011 10:10:47 PM 321 Views
Yes, I think someone fixed it back to the way it was. *NM* - 30/05/2011 10:12:29 PM 257 Views
At first I thought you meant today's comic. - 30/05/2011 11:16:54 PM 812 Views
That would have been very impressive - 30/05/2011 11:42:35 PM 557 Views
Yes, I noticed the date shortly afterwards. - 31/05/2011 08:42:27 AM 501 Views

Reply to Message