If I remember right, Randall had some personal issues around that time, and, for whatever reason, his comic strip never really recovered. Perhaps he's not putting in the same level of effort, or perhaps he's just a more serious guy now, and unable to tap into his goofy past self.
So, how many have tried the claim in today's xkcd text?
- 25/05/2011 05:39:55 PM
1188 Views
I did.
- 25/05/2011 06:13:05 PM
871 Views
Apparently i have a different xkcd..
- 25/05/2011 06:38:14 PM
792 Views
They're talking about the rollover text
*NM*
- 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM
370 Views
*NM*
- 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM
370 Views
I never knew there was roll over text on xkcd. Yeah for more enjoyment of xkcd! *NM*
- 25/05/2011 07:18:27 PM
392 Views
Hahah oh wow! Rollover text is basically just as important to xkcd
- 26/05/2011 04:41:42 AM
773 Views
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is...
- 25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM
824 Views
For the future, it would be helpful to cite what you're talking about. Not all of us read xkcd.
- 25/05/2011 08:23:15 PM
879 Views
... only it isn't [retarded] *NM*
- 25/05/2011 10:23:59 PM
442 Views
It's gotten pretty bad. The science jokes are funny, but Randall doesn't know much of anything else. *NM*
- 26/05/2011 01:18:19 AM
371 Views
Even the science jokes are kinda meh
- 26/05/2011 01:43:22 AM
822 Views
I loved xkcd up until about a year ago.
- 26/05/2011 04:07:04 AM
823 Views
I should have clarified that it did seem good a few years ago. I agree with that. *NM*
- 26/05/2011 04:55:37 AM
344 Views
At first I thought you meant today's comic.
- 30/05/2011 11:16:54 PM
1152 Views

*NM*