It was fairly cool. I tested Sherlock Holmes, lilac, Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams, and all came in between 10 and 24. And then someone seems to have sabotaged it by editing the mathematics pages, it seems, so now there is a loop.
Formally known as patternweaver.
So, how many have tried the claim in today's xkcd text?
25/05/2011 05:39:55 PM
- 1085 Views
I did.
25/05/2011 06:13:05 PM
- 775 Views
Apparently i have a different xkcd..
25/05/2011 06:38:14 PM
- 708 Views
They're talking about the rollover text
*NM*
25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM
- 324 Views

I never knew there was roll over text on xkcd. Yeah for more enjoyment of xkcd! *NM*
25/05/2011 07:18:27 PM
- 351 Views
Hahah oh wow! Rollover text is basically just as important to xkcd
26/05/2011 04:41:42 AM
- 687 Views
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is...
25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM
- 732 Views
For the future, it would be helpful to cite what you're talking about. Not all of us read xkcd.
25/05/2011 08:23:15 PM
- 774 Views
... only it isn't [retarded] *NM*
25/05/2011 10:23:59 PM
- 392 Views
It's gotten pretty bad. The science jokes are funny, but Randall doesn't know much of anything else. *NM*
26/05/2011 01:18:19 AM
- 327 Views
Even the science jokes are kinda meh
26/05/2011 01:43:22 AM
- 725 Views
I loved xkcd up until about a year ago.
26/05/2011 04:07:04 AM
- 739 Views
I should have clarified that it did seem good a few years ago. I agree with that. *NM*
26/05/2011 04:55:37 AM
- 299 Views
It worked this time! *NM*
30/05/2011 10:10:47 PM
- 469 Views
At first I thought you meant today's comic.
30/05/2011 11:16:54 PM
- 1031 Views