Active Users:416 Time:15/09/2026 01:21:13 AM
A first responce Bramhodoulos Send a noteboard - 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM
This is something that started bugging me after a random association yesterday. John the Baptist. On whose authority was he baptising people? No one had died for people's sins yet. From what I understand baptism functions in connection with that. Have I misunderstood something?

And why did Jesus need to be baptised?
I am genuinely curious about the doctrinal reasoning here. It has been a while since I studied these things and for the life of me I cannot remember anything about it. I know that there were several Jewish groups that practised baptism at the time, but I do not know the intra-Christian reasoning for this event.


As a theologian I must say I havn't been doing a lot of research after this, but the first thing I would say would be that whatever view on baptism christians have today (there are some differences on the precise theological importance between Roman Catholics, Reformed (Calvinistic), Lutheran and Baptist churches), it is clear for most people that John the Baptist baptized in a different way.

He basically told people to start living more holy, according to the law of Moses, with a huge emphasis on simply being "honest" (he didn't appear to have a well thought-out ethical system).
As an outward sign of this new way of living, this change of lifestyle, a baptism was mainly focused leaving the past behind and living better lives now. There was probably only a limited theory of salvation involved.

Why Jesus? Noone can probably give a full answer, only that it was "fitting" so that "all righteousness be fulfulled" (Mat.3:15). What all of that involves may take a few years to study, but that was Jesus' answer anyway.
Reply to message
A question on baptism - 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM 1079 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection. - 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM 848 Views
What I meant - 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM 665 Views
I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM 653 Views
Re: I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM 738 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM 667 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM 621 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM 695 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM 606 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM 673 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM 641 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM 824 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM 636 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM 873 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM 847 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM 654 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM 672 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:33:01 PM 527 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:34:36 PM 614 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM 743 Views
Re: I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:54:17 AM 818 Views
He dances and dips in The Ganges- Very Nice. *NM* - 11/06/2011 02:15:41 AM 282 Views
Three dips - that's the ceremony. - 11/06/2011 02:35:43 AM 610 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity - 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM 768 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason - 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM 707 Views
I misunderstood, lets try again - 10/06/2011 01:44:43 PM 801 Views
Huh. *NM* - 10/06/2011 02:06:58 PM 334 Views
A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM 861 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:15:07 PM 817 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:19:25 PM 741 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one? - 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM 853 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical - 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM 689 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water - 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM 758 Views
That is absurd. - 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM 851 Views
It is absurd - 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM 699 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move. - 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM 778 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water" - 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM 640 Views
The point is that it's a symbol. - 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM 649 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM 716 Views
You are totally missing the point. - 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM 806 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense - 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM 778 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion - 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM 1030 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean" - 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM 666 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical. - 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM 714 Views
Shrug. It was on topic. - 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM 984 Views
Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 10:23:02 AM 861 Views
Re: Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 11:51:22 AM 840 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM 321 Views
Because we are all nuts in our own special ways? *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:36:03 PM 277 Views

Reply to Message