Active Users:612 Time:19/03/2026 03:53:15 AM
I have no problem with water as a symbol beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM
My issue is that all the things that "holy water" is supposed to symbolize are the same things that regular water symbolizes.

So, if it's just a symbol, then that means it's your frame of mind that matters. If you're about to bless yourself with holy water and pray to God, it's not going to be somehow a less effective prayer if a dastardly villain has swapped out a bottle of Evian into the font. As long as you're in a prayerful state of mind, that's what counts- the water supposedly just helps you get there.


So if it's not the physical substance, but the state of mind that's important, then it follows that the physical substance is NOT important. That is, if you can achieve the same sincere, prayerful state of mind with some beads, some music, or a cup of Ramen, then everything should be just as good.





So. Now we know that the physical substance doesn't matter- all that matters is that it gets you into the right frame of mind. Holy water makes one think of purity, of life, of being refreshed. So does regular water.


Therefore, there's no reason why "normal" water (that is, not water that has been shit in, Ghav) couldn't be used in whatever rites supposedly demand "holy" water.




(Now, this all falls apart if you say that the physical substance does have some importance. But if that's the case, then we're back to "magic water," that is, water that has special properties that regular water does not.)
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
A question on baptism - 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM 1015 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection. - 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM 777 Views
What I meant - 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM 605 Views
I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM 591 Views
Re: I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM 666 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM 608 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM 563 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM 612 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM 549 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM 610 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM 579 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM 732 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM 574 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM 799 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM 780 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM 586 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM 609 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:33:01 PM 465 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:34:36 PM 538 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM 678 Views
Re: I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:54:17 AM 736 Views
He dances and dips in The Ganges- Very Nice. *NM* - 11/06/2011 02:15:41 AM 253 Views
Three dips - that's the ceremony. - 11/06/2011 02:35:43 AM 536 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity - 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM 710 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason - 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM 653 Views
I misunderstood, lets try again - 10/06/2011 01:44:43 PM 741 Views
Huh. *NM* - 10/06/2011 02:06:58 PM 299 Views
A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM 783 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:15:07 PM 764 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:19:25 PM 675 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one? - 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM 760 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical - 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM 615 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water - 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM 694 Views
That is absurd. - 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM 796 Views
It is absurd - 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM 620 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move. - 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM 723 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water" - 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM 583 Views
The point is that it's a symbol. - 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM 585 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM 660 Views
You are totally missing the point. - 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM 747 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense - 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM 716 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion - 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM 972 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean" - 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM 607 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical. - 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM 653 Views
Shrug. It was on topic. - 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM 923 Views
Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 10:23:02 AM 788 Views
Re: Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 11:51:22 AM 778 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM 274 Views
Because we are all nuts in our own special ways? *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:36:03 PM 247 Views

Reply to Message