Active Users:436 Time:15/09/2026 01:22:38 AM
I have no problem with water as a symbol beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM
My issue is that all the things that "holy water" is supposed to symbolize are the same things that regular water symbolizes.

So, if it's just a symbol, then that means it's your frame of mind that matters. If you're about to bless yourself with holy water and pray to God, it's not going to be somehow a less effective prayer if a dastardly villain has swapped out a bottle of Evian into the font. As long as you're in a prayerful state of mind, that's what counts- the water supposedly just helps you get there.


So if it's not the physical substance, but the state of mind that's important, then it follows that the physical substance is NOT important. That is, if you can achieve the same sincere, prayerful state of mind with some beads, some music, or a cup of Ramen, then everything should be just as good.





So. Now we know that the physical substance doesn't matter- all that matters is that it gets you into the right frame of mind. Holy water makes one think of purity, of life, of being refreshed. So does regular water.


Therefore, there's no reason why "normal" water (that is, not water that has been shit in, Ghav) couldn't be used in whatever rites supposedly demand "holy" water.




(Now, this all falls apart if you say that the physical substance does have some importance. But if that's the case, then we're back to "magic water," that is, water that has special properties that regular water does not.)
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
A question on baptism - 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM 1080 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection. - 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM 849 Views
What I meant - 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM 666 Views
I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM 653 Views
Re: I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM 739 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM 668 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM 621 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM 696 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM 607 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM 674 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM 642 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM 824 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM 637 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM 874 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM 847 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM 655 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM 673 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:33:01 PM 528 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:34:36 PM 615 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM 744 Views
Re: I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:54:17 AM 819 Views
He dances and dips in The Ganges- Very Nice. *NM* - 11/06/2011 02:15:41 AM 282 Views
Three dips - that's the ceremony. - 11/06/2011 02:35:43 AM 611 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity - 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM 770 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason - 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM 708 Views
I misunderstood, lets try again - 10/06/2011 01:44:43 PM 802 Views
Huh. *NM* - 10/06/2011 02:06:58 PM 334 Views
A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM 862 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:15:07 PM 818 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:19:25 PM 742 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one? - 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM 855 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical - 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM 690 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water - 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM 759 Views
That is absurd. - 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM 851 Views
It is absurd - 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM 700 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move. - 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM 778 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water" - 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM 641 Views
The point is that it's a symbol. - 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM 650 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM 717 Views
You are totally missing the point. - 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM 807 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense - 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM 779 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion - 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM 1031 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean" - 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM 667 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical. - 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM 716 Views
Shrug. It was on topic. - 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM 984 Views
Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 10:23:02 AM 862 Views
Re: Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 11:51:22 AM 841 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM 321 Views
Because we are all nuts in our own special ways? *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:36:03 PM 277 Views

Reply to Message