your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM
of course holy water isn't a single lick different than the water it was before it was blessed. It's even less different than homeopathic water, which isn't detectably different either (but at least has some ground to stand on compared to holy water, which hasn't had any physical process applied to it at all).
But it's not ABOUT THAT. It is entirely psychological. It's placebo. It's feel-good.
Yes, scientifically and logically, it is just "magic water". Practically speaking, normal water could easily take the place of "holy water". From a nonspiritual realistic standpoint, the whole deal is totally inane. But that's really not the point.
The point is that people's belief that the blessing of the water brings them closer to their deity and increases their inner purity, which gives them a measure of psychological comfort. In their mind, the blessing adds a new physical property that improves the water. It is illogical. It is blind belief and self-deception. If it helps people get through their life, then whatever, who cares. As long as no one is being hurt, why does it matter whether holy water is ACTUALLY any better?
Additionally, if you think back into history, it could be that holy water WAS "better". In earlier centuries, Holy water coming from a clean, running water source would be HEAPS more healthy than many of the usual water sources. I don't really know, but it would not surprise me if the beliefs around holy water did not stem from similar health histories as dietary laws.
But it's not ABOUT THAT. It is entirely psychological. It's placebo. It's feel-good.
Yes, scientifically and logically, it is just "magic water". Practically speaking, normal water could easily take the place of "holy water". From a nonspiritual realistic standpoint, the whole deal is totally inane. But that's really not the point.
The point is that people's belief that the blessing of the water brings them closer to their deity and increases their inner purity, which gives them a measure of psychological comfort. In their mind, the blessing adds a new physical property that improves the water. It is illogical. It is blind belief and self-deception. If it helps people get through their life, then whatever, who cares. As long as no one is being hurt, why does it matter whether holy water is ACTUALLY any better?
Additionally, if you think back into history, it could be that holy water WAS "better". In earlier centuries, Holy water coming from a clean, running water source would be HEAPS more healthy than many of the usual water sources. I don't really know, but it would not surprise me if the beliefs around holy water did not stem from similar health histories as dietary laws.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 11/06/2011 at 04:15:14 PM
A question on baptism
- 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM
1080 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection.
- 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM
849 Views
What I meant
- 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM
666 Views
I don't follow.
- 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM
653 Views
Re: I don't follow.
- 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM
739 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much.
- 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM
668 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much.
- 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM
621 Views
They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
- 11/06/2011 10:39:26 AM
736 Views
Re: They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
- 11/06/2011 11:53:53 AM
652 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM
696 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM
607 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM
674 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM
642 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM
824 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM
637 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM
874 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM
847 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM
655 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM
673 Views
Circumcision remains common among Christians mostly for symbolic reasons as well.
- 11/06/2011 10:48:48 AM
721 Views
Hm, I don't know. I don't think I know any non-Jews who are circumsized that see it as a symbol
- 11/06/2011 04:44:02 PM
815 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges
- 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM
744 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity
- 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM
769 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason
- 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM
708 Views
A first responce
- 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM
862 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one?
- 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM
854 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical
- 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM
690 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water
- 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM
759 Views
That is absurd.
- 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM
851 Views
It is absurd
- 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM
700 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move.
- 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM
778 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water"
- 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM
641 Views
The point is that it's a symbol.
- 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM
650 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol
- 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM
716 Views
You are totally missing the point.
- 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM
807 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense
- 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM
779 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion
- 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM
1031 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean"
- 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM
667 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical.
- 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM
715 Views
Shrug. It was on topic.
- 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM
984 Views
The more I read of your posts, the more I think you fundamentally misunderstand religious symbolism. *NM*
- 11/06/2011 10:51:17 PM
287 Views
Let me clarify: your statements are absurd.
- 10/06/2011 10:14:06 PM
695 Views
Check my response to Ghav for elaboration, but basically, your argument doesn't hold
- 11/06/2011 04:00:18 AM
670 Views
You went from saying spit was good to saying "clean water".
- 12/06/2011 02:04:26 AM
613 Views
I'm completely consistent. I was just staying away from extremes for conversation's sake.
- 12/06/2011 09:02:02 AM
642 Views
No one from a respectable faith thinks of holy water as "magic water". Period. *NM*
- 13/06/2011 04:56:53 AM
299 Views
All I know, Is a Lutheran Pastor told me, b/c i was not baptised I was going to hell, and had *NM*
- 11/06/2011 03:44:38 PM
272 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site
*NM*
- 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM
321 Views
*NM*
- 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM
321 Views

