I agree they have a lot of "stuff," but I don't think much of it is unwarranted
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 20/09/2011 02:30:35 PM
As we've seen, people are quick to blame teachers.
It's definitely not just when politicians want to create a union debate, either. Parents are willing to blame teachers and school districts at the drop of a hat. Non-parent adults are always a bit resentful of school districts, because they pay all this school tax to something that is seemingly irrelevant to them.
Many school districts have tons and tons of strict regulations governing teacher-student interactions- how they can communicate, if they can be in a room alone together, accepting gifts, and so on.
It's like there's this paranoia- they must have some angle to want to be teachers. Whether it's the summers off, the tenure, or maybe they're secretly a pedophile.
Added to this latent hostility is the fact that... well... how exactly do you judge a teacher? No one seems to have come up with an effective way. I have another teacher friend who teaches 4th grade. One of the things she's judged on is if her students read at a 4th grade level by the end of the school yea4. Which would be fine, if they all came in at a 3rd grade level. But she teaches in a lower-class area, and most of them are 2nd grade level, at best. (I'm generalizing, apparently the gradations of reading level are much finer at that age, who knew? But the point is the same)
What about attendance? Teachers can get graded on that, but they have absolutely no control over that. Same with homework.
Then you have the various standardized tests, which are fine in theory, but you have national tests, state tests, county tests, and they all teach different things, making it difficult to focus on any particular curriculum.
So there's all that. And then, in an amusing flip, sometimes there's NO standardization. So they'll say, "make your kids able to read. Go." And the teacher will use whatever methods he sees best, which is fine, but definitely makes grading teachers tough.
The point of this rambling post is that the teacher's unions have a lot of things like tenure, raises at certain guaranteed milestones, and the like because they know that they're often a scapegoat, and that it's tough to accurately grade them. All it takes is a new state governor to say, "Well, we're grading teachers on how well their kids speak proper English this year," and all the kids with parents who can't speak would have their teachers pay docked.
Teachers are important, but they don't have anywhere near the amount of influence and control over students that we assume they do. Parents, friends, school life outside of the classroom, all have a huge effect on education that the teacher can rarely affect.
It's definitely not just when politicians want to create a union debate, either. Parents are willing to blame teachers and school districts at the drop of a hat. Non-parent adults are always a bit resentful of school districts, because they pay all this school tax to something that is seemingly irrelevant to them.
Many school districts have tons and tons of strict regulations governing teacher-student interactions- how they can communicate, if they can be in a room alone together, accepting gifts, and so on.
It's like there's this paranoia- they must have some angle to want to be teachers. Whether it's the summers off, the tenure, or maybe they're secretly a pedophile.
Added to this latent hostility is the fact that... well... how exactly do you judge a teacher? No one seems to have come up with an effective way. I have another teacher friend who teaches 4th grade. One of the things she's judged on is if her students read at a 4th grade level by the end of the school yea4. Which would be fine, if they all came in at a 3rd grade level. But she teaches in a lower-class area, and most of them are 2nd grade level, at best. (I'm generalizing, apparently the gradations of reading level are much finer at that age, who knew? But the point is the same)
What about attendance? Teachers can get graded on that, but they have absolutely no control over that. Same with homework.
Then you have the various standardized tests, which are fine in theory, but you have national tests, state tests, county tests, and they all teach different things, making it difficult to focus on any particular curriculum.
So there's all that. And then, in an amusing flip, sometimes there's NO standardization. So they'll say, "make your kids able to read. Go." And the teacher will use whatever methods he sees best, which is fine, but definitely makes grading teachers tough.
The point of this rambling post is that the teacher's unions have a lot of things like tenure, raises at certain guaranteed milestones, and the like because they know that they're often a scapegoat, and that it's tough to accurately grade them. All it takes is a new state governor to say, "Well, we're grading teachers on how well their kids speak proper English this year," and all the kids with parents who can't speak would have their teachers pay docked.
Teachers are important, but they don't have anywhere near the amount of influence and control over students that we assume they do. Parents, friends, school life outside of the classroom, all have a huge effect on education that the teacher can rarely affect.
I amuse myself.
Washington Teachers refuse Judge order to return to work.
19/09/2011 11:05:13 PM
- 763 Views
What's the dispute on?
19/09/2011 11:13:24 PM
- 594 Views
Seniority, Class Size, and Salaries.
19/09/2011 11:41:40 PM
- 500 Views
and children have a right to an education.
20/09/2011 12:30:20 AM
- 441 Views
So we ought to pay for it.
20/09/2011 05:48:34 PM
- 424 Views
They aren't solving any problems.
20/09/2011 08:33:22 PM
- 743 Views
Have you heard of another tactic that makes anyone listen?
21/09/2011 12:41:05 AM
- 423 Views
I don't really have any ideas myself. It's not my strong suit (political wrangling, that is)
21/09/2011 01:00:21 AM
- 462 Views
I don't really agree with seniority/tenure as much, but class size...
20/09/2011 07:42:39 PM
- 516 Views
You have to respect people for seeking more money? Seriously?
20/09/2011 12:23:22 AM
- 515 Views
you missed the whole other part where he talks abotu class size and what not
20/09/2011 02:05:12 AM
- 585 Views
Class size is a bullshit argument that teachers' unions push on people.
20/09/2011 03:25:58 AM
- 428 Views
You don't get to use the "Think of the Children" argument... it belongs to the teachers.
20/09/2011 05:52:36 PM
- 406 Views
You don't mean DC, right? I'm roommates with a DC teacher, I feel like I would have noticed
20/09/2011 01:02:00 AM
- 613 Views
seriously. if you break it down hourly...
20/09/2011 01:48:40 AM
- 506 Views
Eh... I'm more union-friendly than most, but teachers' unions are pretty terrible. *NM*
20/09/2011 06:11:09 AM
- 206 Views
I agree they have a lot of "stuff," but I don't think much of it is unwarranted
20/09/2011 02:30:35 PM
- 520 Views
being anti-teacher's union is not the same as being anti-teacher
20/09/2011 03:32:57 PM
- 569 Views
That is similar to claiming to be pro-soldier and cutting the VA.
20/09/2011 06:03:29 PM
- 551 Views
Do you have facts about how teachers are rated?
20/09/2011 08:08:04 PM
- 540 Views
well teachers are rated differently in different systems
20/09/2011 09:23:43 PM
- 610 Views
there are some really shitty charter schools too.
20/09/2011 09:36:42 PM
- 432 Views
and they need to learn form the charter schools that are doing well
20/09/2011 10:06:19 PM
- 534 Views
well there's some problems there
21/09/2011 12:20:27 AM
- 531 Views
I've little sympathy here
20/09/2011 03:08:58 AM
- 570 Views
I have no sympathy whatsoever.
20/09/2011 03:26:29 AM
- 405 Views
Oooh, Cancer is a horrible disease that spreads wildly and kills you!
20/09/2011 06:04:53 PM
- 523 Views
Public sector unions need to be banned
20/09/2011 04:30:00 AM
- 579 Views
+1, as per FDR and union leaders of that time, public unions are asking for trouble/problems. *NM*
20/09/2011 06:52:37 PM
- 213 Views
No, they need to be replaced.
20/09/2011 09:05:52 PM
- 378 Views
no they breed corruption and need to at the minimum be barred from political donations and strikes
20/09/2011 09:51:38 PM
- 590 Views
Fired them all, hire new teachers, end of problem..... *NM*
20/09/2011 06:51:01 PM
- 220 Views
You missed the memo.
20/09/2011 09:45:55 PM
- 454 Views
I would bet a lot of them will show up for the hire back interviews *NM*
20/09/2011 10:07:05 PM
- 202 Views
+1, a huge number of them will come crawling back for jobs. *NM*
20/09/2011 10:11:09 PM
- 233 Views