Of course, the article does fail to answer the rather obvious question "what of the lottery losers?". You can't get a system that does right by *all* children unless those "lower quality" schools offer quality education at a more vocational level - and children and parents both have no problem with choosing vocational schools if those are the most suitable for the child's abilities. In here we have free school choice and different kinds of high schools - vocational, technical, academic, to simplify a bit - but the system is somewhat hampered by the many parents who continue to insist in the face of all evidence that their kids should be in the academic schools, resulting in kids failing year after year and getting utterly demotivated.
School choice works
20/09/2011 10:25:16 PM
- 597 Views
The word "duh" comes to mind.
20/09/2011 11:01:26 PM
- 317 Views
Regardless, you don't refuse to save some just because you can't save all. *NM*
20/09/2011 11:43:04 PM
- 129 Views
When saving some comes at the cost of dooming others, you might.
20/09/2011 11:50:05 PM
- 283 Views

I would assume they kids were taking the extra spots the schools hadm.n
21/09/2011 12:41:20 AM
- 306 Views
Yes, well, they might be performing better exactly because they run below maximum capacity.
21/09/2011 08:53:58 PM
- 272 Views
Cool cool. I'm confused, though- won't pretty much everyone try to get into the "better" schools?
20/09/2011 11:47:45 PM
- 285 Views
If you read the aritcle it tells you the good schools were full to capacity
21/09/2011 12:17:15 AM
- 288 Views