Active Users:921 Time:01/11/2025 05:31:09 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM
Two that I noticed, technically. In #8, it should be Have at the start of the question. In #9, there should be a dash between "140" and "character". Otherwise you could be talking about 140 shortcuts for characters.


I was actually researching when it was appropriate to use a dash. Do you know what I found out? There are some general rules about it but, for the most part, it's really a style choice. I guess it's one of those quirky, undefined areas of writing. Or can it ever really be defined?
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
Grammar junkies Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1114 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... nossy - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 809 Views
I didn't see any errors Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 795 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors nossy - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 674 Views
You mean ... Nate - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 754 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. Nate - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 989 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1267 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 759 Views
Er...yes I meant them as a singular idea... *NM* Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:47:34 PM 463 Views
Use them together, and only together, for fifteen years and we can discuss this again. *NM* Tom - 05/10/2011 09:32:30 PM 397 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 795 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? Nate - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 782 Views
Yeah, pretty much. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 740 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 610 Views
OK then. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 784 Views
No, Joel. You're just wrong. Again. Get used to it. We have. Tom - 05/10/2011 09:31:21 PM 682 Views
I can live with being wrong, at least in the sense of technical error. Joel - 05/10/2011 10:06:30 PM 782 Views
Let's just pare this down to the bare bones. Tom - 06/10/2011 01:37:30 AM 641 Views
He made a mistake that I did not recognize as a mistake because I read his words as he intended. Joel - 06/10/2011 04:43:39 AM 791 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 834 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 787 Views
You're right of course! Nate - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 856 Views
I frequently am. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 857 Views
So I've noticed. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 773 Views
I like telling people, too. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 771 Views
You can use charmap. Joel - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 819 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. Stephen - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 723 Views
Mmm, dashing. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 773 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 831 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: Tom - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 886 Views
I love this bit. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 873 Views
Bring back the BSG! Joel - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 798 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 739 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 894 Views
Re: serial comma. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 768 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 744 Views
Same here Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 658 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". Rebekah - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 731 Views
Re: Grammar junkies random thoughts - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 788 Views
Re: Grammar junkies Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 840 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 832 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* Nate - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 382 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? Joel - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 741 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 686 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* Ghavrel - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 369 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 938 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p Nate - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 826 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." Joel - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 744 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! Nate - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 743 Views
Ghoti. Also, this is why Rebekah and don't argue this any more. *NM* Ghavrel - 06/10/2011 04:44:42 AM 344 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. Joel - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 749 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. Nate - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 757 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) Joel - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 651 Views
But you are wrong Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 782 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* random thoughts - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 400 Views
I disagree. Joel - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 724 Views
How utterly unsurprising Sareitha Sedai - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 692 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." Joel - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 752 Views
Doesn't matter. Sareitha Sedai - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 765 Views
Perhaps not, but it should, and I am not above being a lone voice crying in the wilderness. Joel - 08/10/2011 05:17:35 PM 851 Views
What. Zeeb - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 828 Views
Those cases are not the same, because those words are already possessive in their own right. Joel - 06/10/2011 10:52:06 PM 818 Views
if you have trouble understanding my post it is more likely do to typing skills than grammar random thoughts - 05/10/2011 09:31:42 PM 739 Views
Likely so; I have the same problem, but usually when writing by hand. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:53:08 PM 714 Views
You called? Rebekah - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 824 Views
Grammar schmammar! Avendesora - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 862 Views
Wongy tip #77 Two Wongs - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 724 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. TaskmasterJack - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 731 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* Nate - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 356 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 366 Views
A timeless classic. Nate - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 698 Views
Re: Grammar junkies wolfsister - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 747 Views
Yes. Camilla - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 688 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." Joel - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 727 Views
I try ironclad - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 783 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. Stephen - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 656 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. Tom - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 718 Views
I wish more people knew this. Rebekah - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 681 Views
Junky Grammar. Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 677 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes