Active Users:370 Time:08/03/2026 04:38:10 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I forgot about "of" for "have." Joel Send a noteboard - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM
I really do hate that, worry on some level that some people actually think it is somehow correct usage and employ it exclusively, because there is no way to tell when they speak if they are correctly using the contraction "could've" or incorrectly saying, "could of."
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Grammar junkies Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1143 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... nossy - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 837 Views
I didn't see any errors Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 821 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors nossy - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 700 Views
You mean ... Nate - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 787 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. Nate - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 1015 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1300 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 787 Views
Er...yes I meant them as a singular idea... *NM* Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:47:34 PM 473 Views
Use them together, and only together, for fifteen years and we can discuss this again. *NM* Tom - 05/10/2011 09:32:30 PM 406 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 823 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? Nate - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 806 Views
Yeah, pretty much. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 767 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 649 Views
OK then. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 811 Views
No, Joel. You're just wrong. Again. Get used to it. We have. Tom - 05/10/2011 09:31:21 PM 705 Views
I can live with being wrong, at least in the sense of technical error. Joel - 05/10/2011 10:06:30 PM 813 Views
Let's just pare this down to the bare bones. Tom - 06/10/2011 01:37:30 AM 662 Views
He made a mistake that I did not recognize as a mistake because I read his words as he intended. Joel - 06/10/2011 04:43:39 AM 814 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 859 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 818 Views
You're right of course! Nate - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 883 Views
I frequently am. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 892 Views
So I've noticed. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 804 Views
I like telling people, too. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 798 Views
You can use charmap. Joel - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 850 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. Stephen - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 747 Views
Mmm, dashing. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 800 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 871 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: Tom - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 915 Views
I love this bit. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 900 Views
Bring back the BSG! Joel - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 836 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 772 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 924 Views
Re: serial comma. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 801 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 775 Views
Same here Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 679 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". Rebekah - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 755 Views
Re: Grammar junkies random thoughts - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 815 Views
Re: Grammar junkies Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 875 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 865 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* Nate - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 398 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? Joel - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 774 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 717 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* Ghavrel - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 381 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 967 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p Nate - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 859 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." Joel - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 778 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! Nate - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 767 Views
Ghoti. Also, this is why Rebekah and don't argue this any more. *NM* Ghavrel - 06/10/2011 04:44:42 AM 358 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. Joel - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 780 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. Nate - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 787 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) Joel - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 677 Views
But you are wrong Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 813 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* random thoughts - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 411 Views
I disagree. Joel - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 756 Views
How utterly unsurprising Sareitha Sedai - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 735 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." Joel - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 783 Views
Doesn't matter. Sareitha Sedai - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 794 Views
Perhaps not, but it should, and I am not above being a lone voice crying in the wilderness. Joel - 08/10/2011 05:17:35 PM 880 Views
What. Zeeb - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 861 Views
Those cases are not the same, because those words are already possessive in their own right. Joel - 06/10/2011 10:52:06 PM 849 Views
if you have trouble understanding my post it is more likely do to typing skills than grammar random thoughts - 05/10/2011 09:31:42 PM 765 Views
Likely so; I have the same problem, but usually when writing by hand. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:53:08 PM 740 Views
You called? Rebekah - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 851 Views
Grammar schmammar! Avendesora - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 884 Views
Wongy tip #77 Two Wongs - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 749 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. TaskmasterJack - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 752 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* Nate - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 367 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 388 Views
A timeless classic. Nate - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 725 Views
Re: Grammar junkies wolfsister - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 777 Views
Yes. Camilla - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 715 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." Joel - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 754 Views
I try ironclad - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 808 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. Stephen - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 683 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. Tom - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 772 Views
I wish more people knew this. Rebekah - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 708 Views
Junky Grammar. Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 706 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes