Active Users:325 Time:15/05/2024 01:13:23 PM
while I, of course, disagree with your conclusion. ranagrande Send a noteboard - 10/01/2012 02:21:46 PM
For every idea of his that is acceptable or even attractive to any particular group in American politics, he has two that said group would find absolutely unacceptable. He doesn't want to become president bad enough to abandon his principles, which of course is one of the things so many people admire about his candidacy - but it also means he's not actually a candidate to be President. He just wants to promote his ideas, and he certainly has a lot more influence this way than he'd have through his House seat alone.

Why would that mean he's not actually a candidate? He would have vastly greater influence still to promote his ideas as President.

So to sum up, it's not gonna happen, and you wouldn't like it if it did (although Paul becoming president would definitely be one of the most exciting political experiments in recent history: how much would he actually change, and what would the consequences be? It's just only a madman would want to volunteer his country for said experiment.)

It could happen. After Iowa, there's a three-way tie for first place between Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Ron Paul. With very few votes counted so far in New Hampshire, Paul is a close second to Romney there too.

If by some miracle Ron Paul does get the republican nomination, I think he goes on to become President. (For the record, if by an even greater miracle Jon Huntsman were to be the republican nominee, the general election will be a contest too close for me to call. If it's anyone else: Perry, Gingrich, Santorum, or Romney, than Barack Obama will serve a second term.)

And if it did happen, then yes, I think I would like it very much. I don't completely agree with Ron Paul on everything, but he comes much, much closer than any other candidate in any other party. Unlike with most candidates, and unlike our current President, chances are good that Paul will actually do, or at least try to do, what he says he will. He has a long congressional record to use as evidence: in all his time in the House, he has never voted to raise taxes and he has never voted to go to war.

As you say, it would be exciting to see how many of his ideas he could actually implement, how people would respond to them, and what the results ultimately were. I shall gladly volunteer my country for this experiment, and I'm not a madman. In fact, the last time I took psychiatric exam, the doctor said I was one of the "most classically normal" people he'd seen. Anyway, Paul's theories are sound and any changes he is able to make are sure to be improvements. He certainly couldn't be any worse than Bush or Obama.
Reply to message
Santorum is #2 in Iowa - 04/01/2012 01:24:13 PM 1672 Views
would you stop using that word? It is gross. *NM* - 04/01/2012 01:48:45 PM 537 Views
What's your word for it? *NM* - 04/01/2012 03:43:44 PM 487 Views
Rövsmör. *NM* - 04/01/2012 09:50:21 PM 487 Views
Den var ny för mig. - 06/01/2012 12:12:07 AM 607 Views
yeah that it so funny - 04/01/2012 03:05:59 PM 864 Views
he kind of brought it on himself by being so decidedly anti-gay that it pissed lots of people off - 04/01/2012 04:36:39 PM 903 Views
maybe the gays brought all the gay bashing on themselves - 05/01/2012 03:18:15 PM 1088 Views
Civility is a social contract - 05/01/2012 04:39:46 PM 869 Views
so now that the gays have broken that contract they are fair game? - 05/01/2012 06:37:52 PM 620 Views
Question have you read the Santorum interview? *NM* - 05/01/2012 06:50:24 PM 442 Views
no I try to avoid him - 06/01/2012 06:17:45 PM 735 Views
That's too harsh. - 06/01/2012 07:29:05 PM 841 Views
While language changes with time - 07/01/2012 04:13:28 AM 859 Views
I have to agree. Reluctantly. - 04/01/2012 06:19:13 PM 909 Views
Actually, your response was expected - 04/01/2012 10:08:33 PM 959 Views
don't forget.... - 05/01/2012 02:27:49 AM 844 Views
do you still pretend that it isn't political? - 05/01/2012 03:14:25 PM 794 Views
I'm sorry - 05/01/2012 03:52:57 PM 900 Views
funny how it always woks out that way - 05/01/2012 06:44:55 PM 704 Views
Believe what you will, but my wok skills are poor - 05/01/2012 07:32:17 PM 862 Views
You should ask one of the gays to help you. I hear the gays are good at cooking. *NM* - 06/01/2012 01:54:21 AM 576 Views
Queer stove eye for the straight guy? - 06/01/2012 09:05:48 PM 779 Views
try using more heat and better oil *NM* - 06/01/2012 06:18:19 PM 461 Views
Corn oil? - 06/01/2012 09:05:09 PM 729 Views
Peanut *NM* - 06/01/2012 11:27:49 PM 482 Views
Santorum is a man who believes you must compare homosexual love to bestiality and pedophilia - 05/01/2012 04:42:26 AM 867 Views
and Savage is a Man who believes that vulgar personal attacks - 05/01/2012 03:12:42 PM 1006 Views
Why should a person tolerate intolerance? (Serious question.) *NM* - 05/01/2012 08:46:05 PM 606 Views
The question boils down to why should someone tolerate what they think is wrong. - 05/01/2012 10:53:40 PM 844 Views
and when santorum tells you that your lifestyle is worse than pedophilia and bestiality? - 06/01/2012 03:34:52 AM 792 Views
To be fair... - 06/01/2012 05:32:31 AM 942 Views
You are correct - 06/01/2012 01:21:18 PM 983 Views
Then it seems like it's a problem of definitions more than anything else. - 06/01/2012 09:48:49 PM 898 Views
Following the logic to its bitter end. Why do I do this to myself??? - 06/01/2012 10:14:01 PM 904 Views
Santourm is - 07/01/2012 04:24:45 AM 914 Views
I'm fairly sure your theory is wrong. - 06/01/2012 10:42:14 PM 951 Views
so Obama offended me by attending a racist America hating church - 06/01/2012 05:32:14 PM 825 Views
Those are really not equivalent. - 06/01/2012 04:18:37 PM 753 Views
Re: Those are really not equivalent. - 06/01/2012 10:27:11 PM 884 Views
This. - 07/01/2012 01:35:43 PM 776 Views
I agree, lets shoot anyone who doesn't think like you *NM* - 06/01/2012 05:17:41 PM 464 Views
I'm really conflicted about the whole Santorum thing. - 06/01/2012 07:42:02 PM 836 Views
I find myself agreeing with you recently - 06/01/2012 08:38:37 PM 871 Views
dude, gross! *NM* - 04/01/2012 04:39:34 PM 471 Views
Dear Iowa, - 04/01/2012 08:04:09 PM 870 Views
So at this point, most of the candidates had a moment at the top. Kind of awesome. - 05/01/2012 11:22:50 PM 874 Views
that is why Perry is staying in the race - 06/01/2012 06:20:54 PM 827 Views
It would be the joke of the year if Huntsman got a turn. - 06/01/2012 10:59:36 PM 778 Views
Is he a bigger long shot than Santorum, though? Gingrich? Bachman? CAIN!? - 07/01/2012 01:34:47 AM 881 Views
Yes, for the reason you state. - 07/01/2012 03:04:39 PM 847 Views
I really do not agree. - 09/01/2012 08:51:46 PM 868 Views
he is moving up in New Hampshire - 10/01/2012 05:16:14 PM 963 Views
More like everyone has had a moment running second to Romney. - 07/01/2012 01:59:25 PM 768 Views
It's not a foregone conclusion yet. - 07/01/2012 04:03:51 PM 884 Views
give up the hope it is nothing more than a pipe dream - 09/01/2012 02:57:03 PM 889 Views
All of the republican candidates are pipe dreams. - 09/01/2012 08:56:57 PM 697 Views
I find Ron Paul absolutely infuriating. - 09/01/2012 10:44:09 PM 953 Views
Weed is kinda important - 10/01/2012 03:31:00 PM 728 Views
So is women's health. About 50% of US. *NM* - 13/01/2012 01:46:15 AM 514 Views
Um... - 10/01/2012 03:54:53 PM 783 Views
is an ass - 10/01/2012 05:10:09 PM 925 Views
I would like to see that enforced. - 10/01/2012 05:39:22 PM 1248 Views
So segregation when done by private businesses is ok? - 11/01/2012 02:20:32 PM 961 Views
Define "OK." - 11/01/2012 08:29:09 PM 843 Views
Paul is an equal opportunity infuriator, to borrow Vivien's word. - 09/01/2012 10:56:57 PM 848 Views
I agree with you completely. - 10/01/2012 12:06:19 PM 875 Views
while I, of course, disagree with your conclusion. - 10/01/2012 02:21:46 PM 1289 Views
Re: while I, of course, disagree with your conclusion. - 10/01/2012 07:38:39 PM 870 Views
Ron Paul's biggest problem is isn't a republican - 10/01/2012 04:18:16 PM 872 Views

Reply to Message