while I, of course, disagree with your conclusion.
ranagrande Send a noteboard - 10/01/2012 02:21:46 PM
For every idea of his that is acceptable or even attractive to any particular group in American politics, he has two that said group would find absolutely unacceptable. He doesn't want to become president bad enough to abandon his principles, which of course is one of the things so many people admire about his candidacy - but it also means he's not actually a candidate to be President. He just wants to promote his ideas, and he certainly has a lot more influence this way than he'd have through his House seat alone.
Why would that mean he's not actually a candidate? He would have vastly greater influence still to promote his ideas as President.
So to sum up, it's not gonna happen, and you wouldn't like it if it did (although Paul becoming president would definitely be one of the most exciting political experiments in recent history: how much would he actually change, and what would the consequences be? It's just only a madman would want to volunteer his country for said experiment.)
It could happen. After Iowa, there's a three-way tie for first place between Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Ron Paul. With very few votes counted so far in New Hampshire, Paul is a close second to Romney there too.
If by some miracle Ron Paul does get the republican nomination, I think he goes on to become President. (For the record, if by an even greater miracle Jon Huntsman were to be the republican nominee, the general election will be a contest too close for me to call. If it's anyone else: Perry, Gingrich, Santorum, or Romney, than Barack Obama will serve a second term.)
And if it did happen, then yes, I think I would like it very much. I don't completely agree with Ron Paul on everything, but he comes much, much closer than any other candidate in any other party. Unlike with most candidates, and unlike our current President, chances are good that Paul will actually do, or at least try to do, what he says he will. He has a long congressional record to use as evidence: in all his time in the House, he has never voted to raise taxes and he has never voted to go to war.
As you say, it would be exciting to see how many of his ideas he could actually implement, how people would respond to them, and what the results ultimately were. I shall gladly volunteer my country for this experiment, and I'm not a madman. In fact, the last time I took psychiatric exam, the doctor said I was one of the "most classically normal" people he'd seen. Anyway, Paul's theories are sound and any changes he is able to make are sure to be improvements. He certainly couldn't be any worse than Bush or Obama.
Santorum is #2 in Iowa
04/01/2012 01:24:13 PM
- 1844 Views
would you stop using that word? It is gross. *NM*
04/01/2012 01:48:45 PM
- 625 Views
What's your word for it? *NM*
04/01/2012 03:43:44 PM
- 563 Views
Well, there's nothing wrong with Santoruming in the privacy of one's home.
04/01/2012 02:35:56 PM
- 1173 Views
yeah that it so funny
04/01/2012 03:05:59 PM
- 1033 Views
he kind of brought it on himself by being so decidedly anti-gay that it pissed lots of people off
04/01/2012 04:36:39 PM
- 1073 Views
maybe the gays brought all the gay bashing on themselves
05/01/2012 03:18:15 PM
- 1287 Views
Civility is a social contract
05/01/2012 04:39:46 PM
- 1044 Views
so now that the gays have broken that contract they are fair game?
05/01/2012 06:37:52 PM
- 788 Views
Re: so now that the gays have broken that contract they are fair game?
06/01/2012 05:29:49 PM
- 1055 Views
So is it OK if just insult the gays who are politically active and push their agenda?
06/01/2012 06:16:30 PM
- 1072 Views
If you call them out by name for hypocrisy, then sure.
10/01/2012 05:22:34 PM
- 1096 Views
yes but once you have thrown out all civil decency why start getting nuanced?
11/01/2012 09:09:13 PM
- 1017 Views
Actually, your response was expected
04/01/2012 10:08:33 PM
- 1134 Views
do you still pretend that it isn't political?
05/01/2012 03:14:25 PM
- 946 Views
I'm sorry
05/01/2012 03:52:57 PM
- 1078 Views
funny how it always woks out that way
05/01/2012 06:44:55 PM
- 878 Views
Believe what you will, but my wok skills are poor
05/01/2012 07:32:17 PM
- 1041 Views

You should ask one of the gays to help you. I hear the gays are good at cooking. *NM*
06/01/2012 01:54:21 AM
- 655 Views
Santorum is a man who believes you must compare homosexual love to bestiality and pedophilia
05/01/2012 04:42:26 AM
- 1049 Views
and Savage is a Man who believes that vulgar personal attacks
05/01/2012 03:12:42 PM
- 1196 Views
Why should a person tolerate intolerance? (Serious question.) *NM*
05/01/2012 08:46:05 PM
- 702 Views
The question boils down to why should someone tolerate what they think is wrong.
05/01/2012 10:53:40 PM
- 1012 Views
and when santorum tells you that your lifestyle is worse than pedophilia and bestiality?
06/01/2012 03:34:52 AM
- 956 Views
To be fair...
06/01/2012 05:32:31 AM
- 1100 Views
You are correct
06/01/2012 01:21:18 PM
- 1147 Views
Then it seems like it's a problem of definitions more than anything else.
06/01/2012 09:48:49 PM
- 1076 Views
Following the logic to its bitter end. Why do I do this to myself???
06/01/2012 10:14:01 PM
- 1133 Views

Those are really not equivalent.
06/01/2012 04:18:37 PM
- 923 Views
Re: Those are really not equivalent.
06/01/2012 10:27:11 PM
- 1059 Views
I don't like your definition of tolerance and you're not consistent with it anyway.
07/01/2012 01:49:05 AM
- 1083 Views
In case you were curious, I really disagree with your understanding of tolerance. *NM*
09/01/2012 08:24:45 PM
- 666 Views
So at this point, most of the candidates had a moment at the top. Kind of awesome.
05/01/2012 11:22:50 PM
- 1027 Views
that is why Perry is staying in the race
06/01/2012 06:20:54 PM
- 1000 Views
He should stay, they should all stay. Trump should get back into it and Palin should jump in too.
06/01/2012 07:00:52 PM
- 933 Views
It would be the joke of the year if Huntsman got a turn.
06/01/2012 10:59:36 PM
- 941 Views
Is he a bigger long shot than Santorum, though? Gingrich? Bachman? CAIN!?
07/01/2012 01:34:47 AM
- 1061 Views
Yes, for the reason you state.
07/01/2012 03:04:39 PM
- 1025 Views
I really do not agree.
09/01/2012 08:51:46 PM
- 1041 Views
Like I said, check Obamas numbers any time in the last year and a half.
10/01/2012 11:41:47 AM
- 917 Views
More like everyone has had a moment running second to Romney.
07/01/2012 01:59:25 PM
- 946 Views
It's not a foregone conclusion yet.
07/01/2012 04:03:51 PM
- 1057 Views
It kinda is; Paul cannot even win a majority of Republicans, let alone the country.
07/01/2012 09:09:07 PM
- 1033 Views
Ironically, Paul has a better chance of winning the general election than the republican primary.
07/01/2012 10:14:07 PM
- 1111 Views
What's the likelihood of Paul running as an independent/3rd party if he doesn't get the GOP nod? *NM*
07/01/2012 10:21:23 PM
- 388 Views
Not very high, I think. He didn't try it last time either, and it would hand Obama the election. *NM*
08/01/2012 01:29:01 AM
- 520 Views
many states have laws that you cannot run 3rd party after being on the ballot for a party primary
08/01/2012 06:12:36 AM
- 1150 Views
Yes, he and Romney have that in common, but Pauls positions are (mostly) sincere.
10/01/2012 03:46:04 PM
- 1149 Views
give up the hope it is nothing more than a pipe dream
09/01/2012 02:57:03 PM
- 1056 Views
All of the republican candidates are pipe dreams.
09/01/2012 08:56:57 PM
- 865 Views
I find Ron Paul absolutely infuriating.
09/01/2012 10:44:09 PM
- 1142 Views
Um...
10/01/2012 03:54:53 PM
- 976 Views
Paul is an equal opportunity infuriator, to borrow Vivien's word.
09/01/2012 10:56:57 PM
- 1016 Views
while I, of course, disagree with your conclusion.
10/01/2012 02:21:46 PM
- 1485 Views
The original santorum 2003 interview for those who want to know
07/01/2012 05:32:00 AM
- 1243 Views
And here is the 2002 op ed where he blamed liberalism causing the Catholic Church sex abuse scandal
07/01/2012 05:36:39 AM
- 1046 Views