To score a touchdown when the receiver is already in the end zone, he has to establish control. Otherwise, all a person has to do is touch the football for it to count. Scoring in the end zone without possession is completely different than breaking the plane whenever you already have possession.
I understand the rules. I think the Raven's receiver did have control. Control implies possession. If the refs didn't think he did is bad officiating in my opinion. But that's a judgement call. One that just happened to badly blown. The receiver caught the ball, did not juggle it and got both feet down. Then the ball was knocked out. Asking anything more of the receiver is an inconsistency in the rule when compared with Brady's touchdown.
And what would stiff-arming a tackler be a penalty? The defensive penalties are called before the receiver gets a chance to catch the ball.
1. If after the offensive player catches the ball, can the defender be called for a penalty for purposely touching the ball carrier's head? Yes.
2. Linemen get called for "hands to the face" penalties. Both offense and defense.
Why does a ball carrier get a special exemption from the illegal use of hands rule? Especially when he does it on purpose?
*MySmiley*
I play air tambourine. Competitively.
I play air tambourine. Competitively.
/NFL: i am not watching the super bowl this year
- 23/01/2012 04:32:52 AM
565 Views
The Pats may not even do as well as last time.
- 23/01/2012 05:33:40 AM
572 Views
from a marketing perspective, this is a great matchup
- 23/01/2012 02:38:07 PM
461 Views
Coughlins job ought to be safe at this point.
- 24/01/2012 10:20:33 AM
575 Views
your novella does nothing to change my mind that this game will be worth watching
- 25/01/2012 03:34:49 AM
379 Views
You remind me of video game fans who insist they won't buy BIG SERIES #2.
- 23/01/2012 12:05:58 PM
407 Views
*NM*
2 of my least favorite teams... though honestly I wasn't planning on watching the SB anyway.
- 23/01/2012 01:50:17 PM
590 Views
Theank God I am back in school have no time to watch
- 23/01/2012 02:21:01 PM
400 Views
What are you taking in school? Pleasure or work? *NM*
- 25/01/2012 02:11:19 AM
175 Views
C++ and calculus
- 26/01/2012 05:50:48 PM
368 Views
Hell, once the Bengals lost, there wasn't going to be any interesting matchup to me.
- 23/01/2012 05:47:24 PM
531 Views
Brady was in possession of the ball before diving over the goal line
- 23/01/2012 09:01:51 PM
381 Views
Agreed; dude needs to learn to hold onto a ball when he has both hands on it in the endzone.
- 24/01/2012 10:23:41 AM
439 Views
Yes.
- 24/01/2012 05:29:34 PM
507 Views
*NM*
I won't, either.
- 25/01/2012 02:38:40 AM
435 Views
The Giants are gonna win by 21. So you should watch. It will be fun. 
*NM*
- 25/01/2012 07:06:06 PM
173 Views
*NM*
- 25/01/2012 07:06:06 PM
173 Views
One nice thing about not being an actual football fan:
- 26/01/2012 05:29:00 AM
396 Views
That's like when I watch the CFL. (I mean, if I ever did, it would.) *NM*
- 26/01/2012 04:22:46 PM
176 Views
*NM*
- 26/01/2012 04:22:46 PM
176 Views