Active Users:660 Time:02/06/2026 11:40:15 AM
Yes. Palatine Send a noteboard - 24/01/2012 05:29:34 PM
To score a touchdown when the receiver is already in the end zone, he has to establish control. Otherwise, all a person has to do is touch the football for it to count. Scoring in the end zone without possession is completely different than breaking the plane whenever you already have possession.


I understand the rules. I think the Raven's receiver did have control. Control implies possession. If the refs didn't think he did is bad officiating in my opinion. But that's a judgement call. One that just happened to badly blown. The receiver caught the ball, did not juggle it and got both feet down. Then the ball was knocked out. Asking anything more of the receiver is an inconsistency in the rule when compared with Brady's touchdown.

And what would stiff-arming a tackler be a penalty? The defensive penalties are called before the receiver gets a chance to catch the ball.


1. If after the offensive player catches the ball, can the defender be called for a penalty for purposely touching the ball carrier's head? Yes.

2. Linemen get called for "hands to the face" penalties. Both offense and defense.

Why does a ball carrier get a special exemption from the illegal use of hands rule? Especially when he does it on purpose?
*MySmiley*

I play air tambourine. Competitively.
Reply to message
/NFL: i am not watching the super bowl this year - 23/01/2012 04:32:52 AM 680 Views
The Pats may not even do as well as last time. - 23/01/2012 05:33:40 AM 674 Views
from a marketing perspective, this is a great matchup - 23/01/2012 02:38:07 PM 563 Views
Coughlins job ought to be safe at this point. - 24/01/2012 10:20:33 AM 705 Views
your novella does nothing to change my mind that this game will be worth watching - 25/01/2012 03:34:49 AM 485 Views
I definitely do not expect a blowout. - 25/01/2012 12:29:24 PM 604 Views
You remind me of video game fans who insist they won't buy BIG SERIES #2. - 23/01/2012 12:05:58 PM 519 Views
now i won't JUST TO SPITE YOU!!! *NM* - 23/01/2012 02:32:39 PM 247 Views
I just Pirate it. \o/ *NM* - 24/01/2012 04:55:56 AM 233 Views
I'm not thrilled by either. - 23/01/2012 12:52:09 PM 522 Views
Theank God I am back in school have no time to watch - 23/01/2012 02:21:01 PM 510 Views
What are you taking in school? Pleasure or work? *NM* - 25/01/2012 02:11:19 AM 218 Views
C++ and calculus - 26/01/2012 05:50:48 PM 497 Views
Re: C++ and calculus - 28/01/2012 06:06:10 AM 520 Views
people think I am crazy when I say math is fun - 28/01/2012 02:00:07 PM 470 Views
Hell, once the Bengals lost, there wasn't going to be any interesting matchup to me. - 23/01/2012 05:47:24 PM 654 Views
Brady was in possession of the ball before diving over the goal line - 23/01/2012 09:01:51 PM 507 Views
Yes. - 24/01/2012 05:29:34 PM 618 Views
A few years ago, I would have been inclined to agree. - 25/01/2012 12:55:33 PM 611 Views
That's cool, I don't even know who is in it - 23/01/2012 08:12:00 PM 557 Views
*NM* - 23/01/2012 08:18:24 PM 244 Views
I won't, either. - 25/01/2012 02:38:40 AM 539 Views
You love Brady and you know it! *NM* - 26/01/2012 02:28:35 AM 265 Views
He is better that the twerp - 26/01/2012 10:09:25 PM 478 Views
Barf! - 30/01/2012 10:24:00 AM 525 Views
The Giants are gonna win by 21. So you should watch. It will be fun. *NM* - 25/01/2012 07:06:06 PM 216 Views
the giants will lose but cover the spread - 26/01/2012 04:48:58 PM 485 Views
Re: the giants will lose but cover the spread - 27/01/2012 02:59:48 AM 523 Views
One nice thing about not being an actual football fan: - 26/01/2012 05:29:00 AM 502 Views

Reply to Message