Your logic was as follows:

If someone asks the question, "What is your profession?" to 100 people, all will answer by listing their job. Therefore, all 100 people equate the two words.

That was faulty logic. My use of the (well-known) "leading question" of "When did you cease raping children?" was not a hyperbolic answer. It was an example of how leading questions do not lead to answers that assume the question was valid.

Hyperbole is, as you noted, exaggeration used to create emphasis or effect. The leading question of "When did you cease raping children?" is not an exaggeration of a real situation. It is the use of a leading question that is frequently mentioned when pointing out faults in logic quite often, just like "The next sentence is true. The preceding sentence is false."

The hyperbole that I was complaining about was the way you were exaggerating the way that language evolves beyond any recognition. By the standards you were applying, we should just simply dispense with spelling and grammar, allow ebonics and pidgin dialects of all sorts. It was an exaggeration of the situation that you were passing off as reasonable.

I find it amusing that you are, essentially, defending political correctness and taking personally the attempts by people at this site to actually have words mean what they mean.