Active Users:1075 Time:31/10/2025 04:48:12 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
So if your point is invalid the problem is me; glad to see you are being objective here. Joel Send a noteboard - 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM
I didn’t say we wouldn’t get anyone IO just questioned the quality of what we get.

Yeah, there is a lot of that questioning going around these days, hence the cameras.

The public seems more than a little too eager to abuse the right to filming police officers. If you get caught posting edited footage to give a false impression what happens to you? Hell most people are so convinced the cop was wrong they will continue to believe it even after it is proven the cop followed procedures. I might agree with the idea that cops are video tapped officially and the footage looked at if there are complaints but they should be hostage to any dickweed with a phone that takes video and public who is willing to make judgments based on what said dickweed posted on youtube.

If someone posts footage falsely representing events to defame officers or a police force that seems like grounds for a libel suit. If someone makes it the basis of action against the police we get into areas like filing a false report or perhaps even perjury (yea, I got convicted of a felony; that showed those pigs! )

Bottom line is still that anything done on a public street is public, not private. Again, people get arrested daily for that reason. Why do cops merit a lower standard?
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Upcoming Chicago G8 Summit Focuses Attention on Illinois First Amendment Infringement Joel - 03/02/2012 12:20:25 AM 1113 Views
police officiers have nothing to fear fromvideo taping? Sorry Joel but that is pure crap Ray - 03/02/2012 01:01:51 AM 675 Views
There's a simple solution to this A Deathwatch Guard - 03/02/2012 02:38:05 AM 610 Views
Yeah, funny how well THAT worked. Joel - 03/02/2012 02:59:17 AM 667 Views
would you take a job where your ever move was captured on tape? Ray - 03/02/2012 02:59:46 AM 704 Views
I have had two, that I recall off the top of my head; SOME of us are NOT too good for some jobs. Joel - 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM 563 Views
yes so we would end up with people like you as cops, thanks for making my point Ray - 03/02/2012 04:09:54 AM 545 Views
So if your point is invalid the problem is me; glad to see you are being objective here. Joel - 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM 509 Views
If there were mobs of anger idiots looking set up situation where you could be defaimed Ray - 03/02/2012 04:50:36 AM 596 Views
If it makes you feel better, Rod Blagojevich agrees context ALWAYS exonerates ANYTHING. Joel - 03/02/2012 07:24:55 AM 764 Views
I really have no idea what you are going on about in this rant random thoughts - 03/02/2012 05:31:40 PM 692 Views
You got it in one. Joel - 03/02/2012 07:22:10 PM 669 Views
I'm not asking them to wear them when they go home for the day A Deathwatch Guard - 03/02/2012 05:20:42 AM 626 Views
that is just Big Brother for thee but not for me random thoughts - 03/02/2012 05:45:02 PM 692 Views
This started from the banning of video taping things happening in public A Deathwatch Guard - 03/02/2012 08:22:22 PM 637 Views
There are lots of jobs like that Praziquantel - 03/02/2012 06:19:21 AM 654 Views
and how many of those cameras are controlled by activist looking to smear them? random thoughts - 03/02/2012 05:35:32 PM 727 Views
Isn't this already the case with many police officers / departments? Macharius - 03/02/2012 01:02:25 PM 562 Views
Yes and no; in many cases they can and do turn off the cameras when it suits them. Joel - 03/02/2012 02:33:32 PM 723 Views
As joel pointed those cameras have off switches random thoughts - 03/02/2012 06:02:51 PM 681 Views
I have a job that does that. *NM* Palatine - 03/02/2012 04:37:44 PM 230 Views
a lot of jobs monitor and area but very an individual to wear a camera *NM* random thoughts - 03/02/2012 05:47:59 PM 235 Views
Movie projectionists do. *NM* Ghavrel - 04/02/2012 12:20:21 AM 185 Views
Write a sentence that can be understood and maybe I'll reply with something relevant. *NM* Palatine - 04/02/2012 04:57:27 PM 202 Views
i can't tell if you're making a point or just stupid.... moondog - 03/02/2012 02:42:11 AM 592 Views
luck for my job isn't so hard. Judging you as stupid is an easy call Ray - 03/02/2012 03:46:12 AM 659 Views
No one FORCED the officer in that episode to do ANYTHING. Joel - 03/02/2012 04:57:20 AM 506 Views
The pepper spraying? That is the best you can do? Joel - 03/02/2012 02:54:43 AM 853 Views
OK I see the problem and it is rampant ignorance Ray - 03/02/2012 04:33:47 AM 679 Views
I think we could find a middle ground Urza - 03/02/2012 06:06:32 AM 561 Views
I can sign on for all of that. Joel - 03/02/2012 06:57:54 AM 661 Views
I agree there should be some middle ground random thoughts - 03/02/2012 05:26:33 PM 595 Views
Um, HELLO, it is a felony for journalists to tape police in IL, too. Joel - 03/02/2012 07:16:15 PM 613 Views
That is definitely the problem, though casting aspersions on everyone you can think of hurts, too. Joel - 03/02/2012 06:55:30 AM 790 Views
unfortunately most cops seem to want a double standard moondog - 03/02/2012 02:39:01 AM 584 Views
Ah; I did not realize the SCOTUS had overturned that. Joel - 03/02/2012 03:05:12 AM 541 Views
9-0 decision -- where were you? moondog - 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM 632 Views
Um, Norway? Joel - 03/02/2012 07:08:11 AM 609 Views
Well, public or private, one does not leave one's right to privacy at the door Isaac - 03/02/2012 05:19:12 PM 576 Views
That is an unnervingly good point. Joel - 03/02/2012 07:13:48 PM 618 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes