Active Users:393 Time:01/07/2025 04:12:39 PM
9-0 decision -- where were you? moondog Send a noteboard - 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM
on the one hand, they don't want themselves filmed in public because they think they're entitled to privacy when they are doing their job ...IN PUBLIC.

but yet they are willing to place a GPS tracker on your car without a warrant because they think your personal driveway is a public place and therefore fair game thank goodness the supreme court knocked that one back down, maybe they can get around to the filming issue this year too...

I remembered hearing about it (and the article does reference it,) but not a final SCOTUS verdict. These days I just take it for granted that the SCOTUS will side with the government in all cases unless they were brought by a member of the GOP. Thank God for small blessings, I suppose.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Upcoming Chicago G8 Summit Focuses Attention on Illinois First Amendment Infringement - 03/02/2012 12:20:25 AM 1048 Views
police officiers have nothing to fear fromvideo taping? Sorry Joel but that is pure crap - 03/02/2012 01:01:51 AM 624 Views
There's a simple solution to this - 03/02/2012 02:38:05 AM 566 Views
Yeah, funny how well THAT worked. - 03/02/2012 02:59:17 AM 609 Views
would you take a job where your ever move was captured on tape? - 03/02/2012 02:59:46 AM 661 Views
I'm not asking them to wear them when they go home for the day - 03/02/2012 05:20:42 AM 584 Views
that is just Big Brother for thee but not for me - 03/02/2012 05:45:02 PM 646 Views
This started from the banning of video taping things happening in public - 03/02/2012 08:22:22 PM 594 Views
There are lots of jobs like that - 03/02/2012 06:19:21 AM 611 Views
and how many of those cameras are controlled by activist looking to smear them? - 03/02/2012 05:35:32 PM 693 Views
Isn't this already the case with many police officers / departments? - 03/02/2012 01:02:25 PM 519 Views
As joel pointed those cameras have off switches - 03/02/2012 06:02:51 PM 638 Views
I have a job that does that. *NM* - 03/02/2012 04:37:44 PM 216 Views
a lot of jobs monitor and area but very an individual to wear a camera *NM* - 03/02/2012 05:47:59 PM 219 Views
Movie projectionists do. *NM* - 04/02/2012 12:20:21 AM 168 Views
i can't tell if you're making a point or just stupid.... - 03/02/2012 02:42:11 AM 553 Views
The pepper spraying? That is the best you can do? - 03/02/2012 02:54:43 AM 797 Views
OK I see the problem and it is rampant ignorance - 03/02/2012 04:33:47 AM 631 Views
I think we could find a middle ground - 03/02/2012 06:06:32 AM 521 Views
I can sign on for all of that. - 03/02/2012 06:57:54 AM 624 Views
I agree there should be some middle ground - 03/02/2012 05:26:33 PM 556 Views
unfortunately most cops seem to want a double standard - 03/02/2012 02:39:01 AM 544 Views
Ah; I did not realize the SCOTUS had overturned that. - 03/02/2012 03:05:12 AM 494 Views
9-0 decision -- where were you? - 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM 595 Views
Um, Norway? - 03/02/2012 07:08:11 AM 570 Views
Well, public or private, one does not leave one's right to privacy at the door - 03/02/2012 05:19:12 PM 527 Views
That is an unnervingly good point. - 03/02/2012 07:13:48 PM 565 Views

Reply to Message