Active Users:1333 Time:14/08/2026 06:04:43 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Are you? Legolas Send a noteboard - 01/03/2012 07:03:45 PM
It's good that they have their principles, and stick to them even if it costs them. I don't agree with their principles, and it seems perfectly fair that countries that also disagree with them can choose to not provide funds due to it. That is hardly neocolonialism. After all, the funds don't have to be provided in the first place. They are given out of charity, or as a leverage tool... But either way, it is a voluntary agreement between both sides, not arm twisting.

It's a voluntary agreement between the Ugandan government and other governments - but international aid is, obviously, primarily intended for the Ugandan population, not the government.

And of course it's a lose-lose situation for all involved except perhaps other developing countries that can get a little bit more money from Uganda's share.
Reply to message
Homophobia in Uganda - and the West's role in it Legolas - 29/02/2012 11:09:37 PM 1187 Views
If they don't want development funds, I'm more than fine with it A Deathwatch Guard - 01/03/2012 05:05:19 AM 713 Views
Are you? Legolas - 01/03/2012 07:03:45 PM 636 Views
Ah yes, Jesus' commandment to murder homosexuals must be behind this. Tom - 01/03/2012 05:41:21 AM 614 Views
It is a rather scary mindset, that. Legolas - 01/03/2012 07:06:59 PM 626 Views
Anyone who includes hate in their ideology obviously missed the central teachings of Jesus. Tom - 01/03/2012 08:06:33 PM 564 Views
I think that commandment is probably in this version of the Bible... snoopcester - 01/03/2012 09:59:06 PM 683 Views
Wow, I do not know whether to laugh or cry at that. Joel - 02/03/2012 10:21:17 AM 653 Views
I take it that this is a joke website *NM* Tom - 03/03/2012 02:54:58 AM 248 Views
All signs point to no. *NM* Chas - 03/03/2012 03:17:59 AM 310 Views
I told him to check - looks like people are taking themselves seriously. nossy - 03/03/2012 11:09:49 AM 580 Views
No Conservapedia is not a joke website Roland00 - 03/03/2012 01:30:14 PM 596 Views
So, hypothetical situation. Dannymac - 01/03/2012 03:56:05 PM 566 Views
It's not as if Iran hasn't done just that before. Legolas - 01/03/2012 06:57:54 PM 572 Views
Sure, as long as no permanent Security Council Members veto it. Joel - 02/03/2012 10:28:22 AM 590 Views
Interesting article snoopcester - 01/03/2012 10:09:05 PM 768 Views
Yes, well, turning a party around takes time. Legolas - 01/03/2012 10:33:33 PM 604 Views
That is true but it is never a sure thing that it will hold snoopcester - 02/03/2012 12:55:05 PM 572 Views
Time is on his side. Legolas - 02/03/2012 11:57:02 PM 542 Views
I agree with most of this snoopcester - 04/03/2012 11:28:14 AM 641 Views
What's with the lag? *NM* Legolas - 01/03/2012 10:38:31 PM 229 Views
I blame Ben *NM* snoopcester - 02/03/2012 12:55:56 PM 251 Views
So they are threatening to murder homosexuals to make us stop giving them charity? Joel - 02/03/2012 10:31:46 AM 571 Views
Why the West spends it time and money babying savages across the world is a fucking mystery to me. Dan - 04/03/2012 03:45:40 PM 761 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes